[HiTech RedNeck]

The big question is, how do we know an "error" really is an "error"? That this "error" does not in fact facilitate something else? Without being able to 100% audit the Creator's design goals, that is a mighty arrogant statement to make. Maybe it's there for some other reason. "Apparent anomaly" would be a better term than "error."

[VadeRetro]

The big question is, how do we know an "error" really is an "error"? That this "error" does not in fact facilitate something else? Without being able to 100% audit the Creator's design goals, that is a mighty arrogant statement to make. Maybe it's there for some other reason. "Apparent anomaly" would be a better term than "error."

So <ID_mode> "We can detect design in nature. However, we can only detect adequate design. We can't detect sloppy design, bad design, or no design at all. That would be imputing motives to the Designer." </ID_mode>

Sounds like we can't detect design in nature at all, so what's all this crap about ID?