[RightWingNilla]

And Ohio agreed… Oh, and textbooks are still changing.

None of the items on that list have anything to do with introducing ID into high school biology. Most of it deals with correcting errors and/or overstatemtents in current textbooks. I can actually agree with some of their objections.

[Heartlander]

They currently want the textbooks to be accurate and that is all.

[pickemuphere]

It is telling that this author can only cite 3 peer-reviewed ID "articles"--one of which is his own tendentious book. There are thousands of articles published each year; two legitimate p.r. articles seems exceedingly scant proof for his argument.

I wonder if the author pursues his scientific endeavors with the same rigor. ;)