Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alamo-Girl
I would tend to order it the other way around, with the group heading "Intelligent Design theories" and underneath - Judeo/Christian, YEC, panspermia, universal consciousness, etc.

That hardly seems unreasonable, if you find it more convenient or more accurate to think of it in those terms.

I personally believe that naturalistic/materialistic theories - all strongly deterministic theories - also point to a creation despite all their objections to the contrary. I say this because all of the theories require a beginning - even imaginary time theory, multi-verses and ekpyrotic cosmology.

Possibly. Perhaps some things are simply not knowable to us. Yet. ;)

155 posted on 11/04/2003 11:16:49 AM PST by general_re ("I am Torgo. I take care of the place while the Master is away.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]


To: general_re
Thank you so much for your reply and for your accepting my preference for a hierarchical organization of the theories!

Perhaps some things are simply not knowable to us. Yet.

Indeed. In the end, some may label the unknown as the "anthropic principle" while others choose the term "intelligent design".

227 posted on 11/04/2003 8:56:18 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson