To: general_re; betty boop
Er, I beg to differ. Panspermia and creative universal consciousness (both of which fall under intelligent design theory) neither require the person of a single creator.
Conversely, conventional science itself (without a hint of creationism or intelligent design) points more directly to a single Creator in that it has concluded the universe (or multi-verse) had a beginning.
To: Alamo-Girl
Panspermia and creative universal consciousness (both of which fall under intelligent design theory) neither require the person of a single creator. I'm interested to hear how there is "design" in the absence of a "designer" ;)
111 posted on
11/04/2003 9:37:13 AM PST by
general_re
("I am Torgo. I take care of the place while the Master is away.")
To: Alamo-Girl
Panspermia isn't intelligent design; it is merely adding another layer of turtles.
138 posted on
11/04/2003 10:39:54 AM PST by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson