Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: general_re; betty boop
Er, I beg to differ.

Panspermia and creative universal consciousness (both of which fall under intelligent design theory) neither require the person of a single creator.

Conversely, conventional science itself (without a hint of creationism or intelligent design) points more directly to a single Creator in that it has concluded the universe (or multi-verse) had a beginning.

106 posted on 11/04/2003 9:11:05 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]


To: Alamo-Girl
Panspermia and creative universal consciousness (both of which fall under intelligent design theory) neither require the person of a single creator.

I'm interested to hear how there is "design" in the absence of a "designer" ;)

111 posted on 11/04/2003 9:37:13 AM PST by general_re ("I am Torgo. I take care of the place while the Master is away.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

To: Alamo-Girl
Panspermia isn't intelligent design; it is merely adding another layer of turtles.
138 posted on 11/04/2003 10:39:54 AM PST by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson