Skip to comments.
Call It Krugmanfreude. Not everyone is overjoyed with 7.2 percent GDP.
NRO ^
| November 03, 2003, 1:21 p.m.
| Donald Luskin
Posted on 11/03/2003 10:37:13 AM PST by .cnI redruM
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Krugman is an Energizer Bunny of negative sentiment. If we were to rate negativity on a scale of 1 to 10, and we made 0 zoloft and 10 Pat Buchanon, 'Kruges' would be up to about an 8.5.
To: .cnI redruM
He focuses on the "payroll" survey produced by the Department of Labor, which shows 2.6 million jobs lost since Bush took office. But the DOL's alternate jobs statistics the "household" survey that is used to compute the unemployment rate shows that the economy is down only 273,000 jobs.
2
posted on
11/03/2003 10:40:05 AM PST
by
Coop
(God bless our troops!)
To: .cnI redruM
Does anyone in the know take Krugman seriously?
3
posted on
11/03/2003 10:42:19 AM PST
by
MEG33
To: Timesink
"Krugmanfreude." LOL!
4
posted on
11/03/2003 10:42:48 AM PST
by
martin_fierro
(_____oooo_( ° ¿ ° )_oooo_____)
To: Coop
5
posted on
11/03/2003 10:43:25 AM PST
by
Diogenesis
(If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us)
To: .cnI redruM
Well, this is only because of people spending up the money they got from the tax cut. Well, no, we never said that only the rich would get money from the tax cut and they would save it not spend it.
Besides, a 7.2% economic growth rate is a risky Republican strategy that will lead to hyper-inflation.
(/sarc)
6
posted on
11/03/2003 10:47:34 AM PST
by
johnb838
(What about MY right to free speech?)
To: .cnI redruM
I think Krugman would be a Spinal Tap 11 on a scale of 1 to 10.
7
posted on
11/03/2003 10:49:23 AM PST
by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
To: johnb838
Besides, a 7.2% economic growth rate is a risky Republican strategy that will lead to hyper-inflation. My liberal friend claims that Reaganomics ran the economy 'too hot'.
To: .cnI redruM
Schadenfreude that's that word for taking pleasure in the other guy's failure. But what's the word for that feeling you get when you've been hoping for the other guy to fail, but he ends up succeeding . . . spectacularly?
Um, typically in the English language we call that "sour grapes"...
9
posted on
11/03/2003 10:50:12 AM PST
by
Paladin2b
To: Semper Paratus
But I bet the Clinton porridge was just right! :-)
10
posted on
11/03/2003 10:50:43 AM PST
by
Coop
(God bless our troops!)
To: johnb838
If you're as much of a flat tire as Paul Krugman, I doubt hyper-inflation would have much effect.
11
posted on
11/03/2003 10:54:28 AM PST
by
.cnI redruM
(Mouthing support for the workingman is one of the best ways to avoid actually being one.)
To: MEG33
One of my colleagues has been so taken in by Krugman that he sold all his stock and has bought gold as a hedge against the coming economic collapse.
To: .cnI redruM; All
13
posted on
11/03/2003 10:59:33 AM PST
by
backhoe
(Just an old Keyboard Cowboy, ridin' the trakball into the Sunset...)
To: MEG33
Does anyone in the know take Krugman seriously?It's hard for me to imagine anyone to the right of Mao taking Krugman seriously.
14
posted on
11/03/2003 11:00:53 AM PST
by
CAR913
(NEA = Not Educating Anyone)
To: .cnI redruM
15
posted on
11/03/2003 11:00:53 AM PST
by
Akira
(Blessed are the cheesemakers.)
To: .cnI redruM
You won't hear many places that a high percentage of those jobs "lost" were lost due to increased productivity, generally perceived to be a good thing.
Productivity, that is, not job losses.
16
posted on
11/03/2003 11:01:13 AM PST
by
Redbob
("Fry Mumia!")
To: MediaMole
I know someone with wealth who spent thousands for Y2K provisions.There is no accounting for the reactions to uncertainty and to fearmongers.
17
posted on
11/03/2003 11:01:16 AM PST
by
MEG33
To: .cnI redruM
"This is a RISKY RECOVERY SCHEME!" </Gore>
18
posted on
11/03/2003 11:02:30 AM PST
by
TheBigB
("We are a NEWSPAPER! We are supposed to print THE NEWS!"--Carl Kolchak)
To: .cnI redruM
All these blogs completely ignore the effects of 9/11. 9/11 dealt the economy a huge blow, which it is just now overcoming. This slowdown obviously effected the national debt and destroyed millions of jobs. 9/11 occasioned an expensive series of military actions which further tipped the deficit.
The jobs destroyed by 9/11 might more fairly be charged to Bill Clinton, whose feckless and irresolute foreign policy encouraged terrorist to attack the United States.
An intellectually honest critic of the President must account for the effects of 9/11. The set of intellectually honest critics obviously excludes Krugman.
To: johnb838
Besides, a 7.2% economic growth rate is a risky Republican strategy that will lead to hyper-inflation. You know, I read the 7.2% number last week, and I thought it was time for the NYTimes to shift seamlessly from "the economy is stagnant" to "the economy is overheating".
Give it time. Not even the intellectual whores at the NYTimes can turn on a dime. By the first of December we'll be hearing about the dangers of hyperinflation.
In the mean time, start ringing those Christmas cash registers! You just know the story in three weeks will be about how retailers are not meating their "expectations" of a 25% increase in sales this Holiday season. That's one story that can be filed a year in advance.
20
posted on
11/03/2003 11:10:24 AM PST
by
gridlock
(Rooting for the Yankees means you can say, "We'll get 'em next year!", and mean it!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson