Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Some hope remaining.
A friend of mine, who is Catholic, told me about a theory on the celibacy thing. Some people claim that because early popes, bishops, etc. tended to accumulate a lot of wealth the church didn't want them to have families to pass their wealth on to.

Actually, the early popes, bishops, etc. tended to be martyred. It didn't become safe to be a Christian until somewhat later.

Your friend is correct, however, that the property question was one (not the only) consideration touching on celibacy. The church -- not the priest, bishop, or pope -- accumulated great wealth through bequests, and the institutional Church wanted to avoid the temptations of benefices becoming quasi-heriditary.

As I understand it, however, the ideal of celibacy was honored in the western church from a very early period, long before property would have been much of a consideration and certainly before the rule became mandatory. The personal example of Jesus was central to this. The idea current in the early church that the Second Coming was imminent also played an important role.

Perhaps one of our house experts will be good enough to weigh in on this.

76 posted on 11/03/2003 10:31:19 AM PST by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: sphinx
Actually, the early popes, bishops, etc. tended to be martyred. It didn't become safe to be a Christian until somewhat later.

Fair enough, although one could argue that celibacy didn't become established until that same "later." :)

77 posted on 11/03/2003 11:46:15 AM PST by Some hope remaining.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson