Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: G.Mason
I think Farah is dead wrong on this one. Hillary was indeed keeping her option open as long as possible, and the nomination has always been hers for the taking. My prediction is that she will not run 2004. Reason: Good economic news. No dim is going to beat Bush in '04, and she has no intention of being the lamb that goes to the electoral slaughter.
17 posted on 11/03/2003 6:44:28 AM PST by blanknoone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: blanknoone
"I think Farah is dead wrong on this one. Hillary was indeed keeping her option open as long as possible, and the nomination has always been hers for the taking. My prediction is that she will not run 2004. Reason: Good economic news. No dim is going to beat Bush in '04, and she has no intention of being the lamb that goes to the electoral slaughter."

Some of us are on the right track here.

Others? Well let's say paranoia is striking deep.

My logic says she's a loser in 2008 against Rudy, or another "light" that hasn't shown as yet.

The dims have gone down the road that leads to extinction for the far left.

Graham of Fl. is going to the "BobDole" retirement farm. Good chance Fl will get a Repub senator in 2004.

Zell Miller ....... Arnold Schwarzenegger ....... the list goes on.

I'll keep the faith.

66 posted on 11/03/2003 1:55:34 PM PST by G.Mason (Lessons of life need not be fatal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson