Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Devil_Anse
I heard Baden on Fox today say that the defense had to call a relatively unknown to testify against mitochondrial DNA testing because Lee and Weicht(sp?) probably would refuse to do so. It's an accepted method of testing DNA in the forensic community, according to Baden. He says that Lee and Weicht may still attack the method, possesion, handling, etc. at some future date.
96 posted on 11/03/2003 7:24:31 PM PST by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]


To: RGSpincich
Thanks for that report RG!! I too can't see Lee or Wecht challenging the validity of Mitochondrial DNA. We just want it to get in and all of the experts and Lawyer talking heads I've heard say that it will make it in.
100 posted on 11/03/2003 7:28:09 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

To: RGSpincich
Well, sorry, but I don't care what other posters I offend, I'm going to have to join the ranks of people who ask: "WHEN has this highly-touted expert, Dr. Henry Lee, EVER made a difference in a case?" He's so equivocal about literally everything. It's all a game, and even with his many degrees and his years of testifying (um, what DOES a person LEARN about his field by testifying, btw?), he resembles a traveling medicine show. His whole manner is a disgraceful cheapening of his obviously thorough and high-level education.
102 posted on 11/03/2003 7:31:39 PM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson