To: Sandylapper
I agree Sandy, if the hair is all they have, I could not convict either...I don't think the State is fool enough to think they can try him on that alone. He will never be bound over on just that...there has to be much more, I think the hair is just what they need to link Laci to the boat, the boat was the means to dispose of her. We'll see what the 90 bags they took out of the house provides for their case, along with the previous family testimony that underminded his alibi.
To: Jackie-O
He will never be bound over on just that...there has to be much moreHe's going to be bound over based on the fact that her body and the baby's washed up very near the spot where he said he was fishing, if all the talking heads are correct. Using that one hair seems trivial to me, when there's a waist band out there that would tell us what she was wearing. Why not use your best weapon? That hair ain't it, I hope. JMO
167 posted on
11/04/2003 12:05:35 PM PST by
Sandylapper
(Can I still be a SCOW?)
To: Jackie-O
That hair is likely the "least" of what they have. They are introducing it along with damaging testimony to his alibi and truthfulness to get to trial!! The wiretaps are gonna be good. He's a big mouth. His egomania keeps his lips flapping before his brain ever gets in gear. He's gonna convict himself with his own big mouth. Plus he's a pathological liar. The string of non-stop lies eventually makes people doubt anything he says. And then there is his actions. I am kinda of the opinion that he may have given Amber some of the jewelry that he said Laci was wearing when she went "missing"!
178 posted on
11/04/2003 1:37:52 PM PST by
Canadian Outrage
(All us Western Canuks belong South)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson