Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Velveeta
I had not realized that the leaked autopsy reports said the cervix was intact - guess I have to read slower.
I do agree that the baby was not born. But to me, saying the cervix was "intact" does not mean it was fully closed. I keep wondering about the duct tape applied to that area - it seems as if something drew his attention there.
157 posted on 11/04/2003 9:37:32 AM PST by Cloe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]


To: Cloe
"Someone" wanted to secure that crotch area. Doesn't make sense that if a stranger killed her they'd take such care at taping her up. You'd think they would just dump the body asap.
162 posted on 11/04/2003 9:55:29 AM PST by Velveeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

To: Cloe
What drew his attention there is that he was taping her up into a sausage roll!! The cervix had never been opened!! The baby was expelled through the fundus or top of the uterus after it became weak from decomposition!
175 posted on 11/04/2003 1:33:49 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

To: Cloe
I do agree that the baby was not born. But to me, saying the cervix was "intact" does not mean it was fully closed. I keep wondering about the duct tape applied to that area - it seems as if something drew his attention there.

Just speculating here, but maybe her water broke, and there was amniotic fluid all over the floor. And he might have used the bleach to mop that up.

176 posted on 11/04/2003 1:34:22 PM PST by texasbluebell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson