Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Robert Novak: "The Importance of Beating Haley" Barbour in Mississippi
The American Cause ^ | 10-30-03 | Novak, Robert D.S.

Posted on 11/02/2003 6:34:16 PM PST by Theodore R.

The importance of beating Haley Robert Novak (archive)

October 30, 2003

JACKSON, Miss. -- Rudy Giuliani was here earlier. Dick Cheney campaigned in the state Monday. George W. Bush on Saturday will make two stops in Mississippi. And to cap it off, auto driver Darrell Waltrip arrives before Tuesday's election. All are trying their best to elect as governor Haley Barbour, a major player in national Republican politics for a generation.

No prominent national Democrat dares set foot in the state to help re-elect Gov. Ronnie Musgrove. He would meet Bill Clinton or Al Gore at the state line to keep them out. But that does not mean this election is unimportant for the Democrats. National Chairman Terry McAuliffe has spread the word that defeating so prominent a Republican in the Deep South would "pave the way" for defeating President Bush nationwide next year.

The importance of beating Barbour goes beyond Democrats retaining one of their few Southern footholds. Mississippi is a laboratory for use of personal attacks that are at the heart of McAuliffe's model for beating Bush. But Musgrove, an accomplished hit man, went a step too far in accusing Barbour as a Washington lobbyist of helping "tobacco companies poison our kids." Since that allegation, Barbour has broken out of a virtual dead heat to a five-point lead in the polls.

Mississippi is the most Republican of the Deep South states, won by Bush in 2000 by 17 points and represented in the U.S. Senate by two Republicans. Musgrove occupies the governor's office because of a lackluster campaign by his Republican opponent, then Rep. Mike Parker. Yet, if African-Americans (one-third of the state's population) vote in unusually high numbers, Musgrove can win. Democrats hope a black candidate for lieutenant governor, State Sen. Barbara Blackmon, brings them out Election Day.

Bush's Mississippi landslide included little more than 3 percent of the black vote, and polls now give Barbour 11 percent. However, Barbour does not match Bush in total domination of white voters. A recent survey shows Barbour ahead of Musgrove, 70 percent to 22 percent. But if the Democrats get up to 25 percent of whites, the Republican is in trouble.

That's where the politics of personal destruction comes in. To woo white voters in this conservative state, longtime office seeker Musgrove cannot appear much to the left of Barbour. He positions himself as pro-life, pro-gun and anti-tax, calling himself "independent" and "conservative" (while Barbour is self-identified as "Republican" and "conservative"). With both candidates given its "A" rating, the National Rifle Association endorsed Musgrove on grounds that a tie goes to the incumbent (and the NRA always likes to back a Democrat to maintain its non-partisanship). That edge is expected to be nullified this week with the endorsement of Barbour by pro-gun totem Charlton Heston.

So, Musgrove's quest for white votes necessarily is based on personal attacks. During their last debate, he declared: "The choice is clear: a governor who is going to work for you, or a Washington, D.C., multi-millionaire lobbyist who's going to use his power and influence to work for them."

Barbour's background is indeed unusual. His only previous experience as a candidate came 21 years ago when at age 35, the former GOP state party staff director was badly beaten by octogenarian conservative Democratic Sen. John Stennis. After that, his career centered on Washington -- as White House political director, Republican National Chairman and founder of a powerhouse lobbying firm. Barbour returned home every weekend to a modest house in Yazoo City, Miss. That has not impeded Musgrove's television ads (financed largely by the trial lawyers) from assailing Barbour as the evil lobbyist.

Musgrove's latest ad cited a 1999 Barbour quote, featuring his self-effacing humor: "I don't have anything that's not for sale except my wife and children." That prompted the announcer to say: "Washington lobbyist Haley Barbour helped Mexico steal Mississippi jobs and tobacco companies poison our kids."

Earlier Musgrove ads held down Barbour's support, but this last attack may have gone too far. It was followed not only by Barbour's best showing in the polls, but also generated protests from non-conservative newspapers. Tuesday's voting in Mississippi will determine whether there are limits to the kind of politics Terry McAuliffe likes to play.

©2003 Creators Syndicate, Inc.


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: Mississippi
KEYWORDS: backfire; barbour; blackmon; blacks; bush; cheney; clinton; darrellwaltrip; democrat; giuliani; gore; governor; lobbyist; mcauliffe; mikeparker; ms; musgrove; republican; stennis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last
The Democrats are expecting an upset Tuesday -- hoping to hold MS for Musgrove.
1 posted on 11/02/2003 6:34:17 PM PST by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: WKB
*ping*
2 posted on 11/02/2003 6:55:34 PM PST by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dixiechick2000; Hottie Tottie; MagnoliaMS; MississippiMan; vetvetdoug; NerdDad; Rebel Coach; ...
Missippy ping
3 posted on 11/02/2003 6:57:54 PM PST by WKB (3!~ How come wrong numbers are never busy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
People are sick of this McAuliffe/clinton garbage.
4 posted on 11/02/2003 7:00:27 PM PST by Roscoe Karns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
would really suck to lose to a D in Miss.
5 posted on 11/02/2003 7:02:57 PM PST by jern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jern
If Musgrove wins, look for McAuliffe to declare "total victory" and predict the defeat of G.W. Bush in 2004!! Yet this gubernatorial race has no bearing on the next presidential contest.
6 posted on 11/02/2003 7:29:09 PM PST by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Yeah, but he'll declare exactly the same thing if Musgrove loses.
7 posted on 11/02/2003 7:33:02 PM PST by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: WKB
Damn democrat's have an 'insatiable' thirst for power --- they must really get-off from smearing their opponents because that's their tactic in all 50 states.

Musgrove's latest ad cited a 1999 Barbour quote, featuring his self-effacing humor: "I don't have anything that's not for sale except my wife and children." That prompted the announcer to say: "Washington lobbyist Haley Barbour helped Mexico steal Mississippi jobs and tobacco companies poison our kids."

How many TV's have you shot a hole thru?

8 posted on 11/02/2003 7:55:49 PM PST by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Phil Gramm once said "My dog and my wife are not for sale." (He said it in that order, too.)

Does that mean everything else IS?

9 posted on 11/02/2003 7:59:28 PM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a dog or a cat from a shelter. You will save one life, and may save two.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
" Terry McAuliffe has spread the word that defeating so prominent a Republican in the Deep South would "pave the way" for defeating President Bush nationwide next year"

Oh puleeze Terry. Quite a record he's got going. Lost the presidency, predicted defeat for Jeb Bush In Florida and oh how about those midterms. Lost the House. One more. Lost California governorship. I pray he stays in leadership for a long time.

10 posted on 11/02/2003 8:02:37 PM PST by Davea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
LOL! And wasn't it HST who said the only friend a pol can have in DC is a dog? I don't think he meant to exclude his wife Bess in that comment either.

This Musgrove character is making me ill. I want Haley to win and to win BIG.
11 posted on 11/02/2003 8:03:06 PM PST by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Barbour does not match Bush in total domination of white voters. A recent survey shows Barbour ahead of Musgrove, 70 percent to 22 percent. But if the Democrats get up to 25 percent of whites, the Republican is in trouble.

Good grief!

12 posted on 11/02/2003 8:09:58 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
John Breaux once said that he would never sell his vote but he might lease it out from time to time.
13 posted on 11/02/2003 9:20:42 PM PST by afuturegovernor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Davea
Oh pleeezze, oh please!
14 posted on 11/02/2003 9:35:11 PM PST by Atchafalaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: afuturegovernor
Went to USL with him. Piss on him.
15 posted on 11/02/2003 9:36:49 PM PST by Atchafalaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Who controls the state legislature and who will they appoint if neither candidate get 50% or more of the vote?
16 posted on 11/02/2003 9:41:10 PM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
If Musgrove wins, the press will declare it a "total victory" -- and a trend. If Barbour wins it will mean nothing. Don't you just love the double standard?

"If Musgrove wins, look for McAuliffe to declare "total victory"..."

17 posted on 11/02/2003 10:09:58 PM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Consort
The Dems have a big margin in the State House, but Amy Tuck who is the incumbent Lt. Gov (and now a Republican) MIGHT make some difference.

This whole race is a mystery in terms of the polls. In a state which has been trending GOP [Only Carter has won the state for the Dems since before the days of Wallace; Two GOP senators who never even get legitimate threats anymore; three of last four governor elections (and the last one pissed away by Parker)] how is it possible that a man who did not get 50% last time and has administered 4 of the worst fiscal years in the last 50 can be running even in the polls?
Barbour is, except for the lobbying thing, the prototype of the candidate who should whip Musgrove like an egg-sucking dog.

Given all that, I'm forced to conclude the polls are wrong or there is massive skulldugery afoot or both.

A prediction?

Barbour will end up with something on the order of 54% of the vote.
If not, then it'll be a darn screwy if not overtly suspicious result.
18 posted on 11/02/2003 10:16:05 PM PST by WillRain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: WillRain
So, Musgrove could win even if he gets fewer votes then Barbour if neither gets more than 50%? Then Breaux can resign and be replaced by another Democrat appointed by Musgrove?
19 posted on 11/02/2003 10:22:27 PM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
But it would hardly be a great sign for the Democrats
in 2004 that would only be keeping something
they have and there is no doubt Bush will win Mississippi
even if the collapses politically between now
November 2004.

20 posted on 11/02/2003 11:29:01 PM PST by Princeliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson