[Conservative til I die]

You paid lip service to my "what if Rush is guilty" question, but really you dodged it, talking more about lack of evidence and the like. My point is, if Rush were to be indicted, there was evidence against him, and he was convicted, would you support him getting the book thrown at him, without sympathy?

IMO, Rush is probably guilty. People with painkiller addictions tend to run through their prescriptions with days and sometimes weeks until the next refill. Either that means Rush is going cold turkey for periods of time, or he's getting it through more nefarious means. Of course, I think such laws are stupid and the way we treat drug addicts is wrongheaded, so my conscience is clean when I say leave Rush alone.

[robertpaulsen]

You have no idea what the question is, but I'm supposed to have a concrete answer for you? Idiotic.

If he is indicted. For what? Evidence. What kind? Convicted? Of what crime? You don't have a single clue. Guilty? Of what? Doing drugs? Doing drugs is not a crime (look it up).