Replies

Can't it be argued that Demers is circling the wagons to protect one of his own? (Greer)

Pending Supreme Court review, I doubt any judge will order that the dehydration/starvation be resumed, as that would constitute an irreversible error if Terri's Law is upheld by a higher court and she dies in the meantime of court-enforced dehydration/starvation.

Regardless of the outcome of Wolfson's investigation, there has been no ruling - yet - on Anderson's motion to remove Michael as guardian - that is coming up November 5.

Removal of Michael as guardian SHOULD BE a slam dunk! (to use a little basketball terminology)

From the Palm Beach Post:

"Michael Schiavo's attorney, George Felos, tried twice to have the new law blocked by a Pinellas County judge but he refused. But the judge gave Felos five days to make new arguments and Terri Schiavo's parents five days to respond."

"Anderson said that earlier Wednesday, she had gotten a motion hearing date of Nov. 5 on her petition to remove Michael Schiavo as guardian of his wife."

I did not know that Pat Anderson will try on Wednesday to have Schiavo removed as guardian. How can she do this? Will Demers even recognize her to make a motion?

Wouldn't it be Wolfson, who would have to make such a motion, and we all think he is pro-Schiavo? Moreover, there is no chance that Demers will permit Schiavo's removal as guardian. Demers is just George W. Greer with eyesight, as I see it.