Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

For Schumer, His Method and Success Draw Fire
NY Times ^ | November 1, 2003 | RAYMOND HERNANDEZ

Posted on 11/01/2003 4:25:26 AM PST by Pharmboy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
More balance from the "Paper of (an Awful) Record" than I would have expected. Upchuck is a radical socialist--they should have called him that.
1 posted on 11/01/2003 4:25:27 AM PST by Pharmboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
I despised him in the House.Nothing's changed.
2 posted on 11/01/2003 4:38:20 AM PST by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
But Mr. Long reiterated his long-held contention that Mr. Schumer has shown a bias against judicial candidates who display deeply held Roman Catholic beliefs against abortion and gay rights. "He's not a bigot," he said. "But he has a very strong bias."

He is bigoted against Catholics. He and the dems have filibustered them, because their prejudices have determined all Catholics unfit for office. What else is it but that?

3 posted on 11/01/2003 4:39:01 AM PST by tioga (Happy Weekend....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Shoe-muck is a Lens Louse Liberal.
4 posted on 11/01/2003 5:01:01 AM PST by Solamente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy; snopercod; ~Kim4VRWC's~
Charles Schumer + John W. Hechinger Foundation (Hechinger Hardware)+ Handgun Control, Inc.

Somewhere in ~Kim4VRWC's~'s 2nd Amendment pages, their associations are explained.

5 posted on 11/01/2003 5:04:24 AM PST by First_Salute (God save our democratic-republican government, from a government by judiciary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Yous Guys can call him all the names you want as well as I, but it will not change the fact that these prix like Schoomer malign and smear Bush's judicials nominees.

What are "WE" going to do about it? Because obviously the dem tactics are working and Frist's and the wobbly Repubs are not!

6 posted on 11/01/2003 5:10:21 AM PST by sirchtruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: First_Salute
When I lived in Manhattan and he was running for office (I think it was '98) he was campaigning at my subway stop (77th and Lex). As I walked down the stairway, there he was with extended arm and a smile waiting to shake my hand. I (a big guy wearing aviator sunglasses) slowly truned to him and said clearly and slowly: "NRA"

Boy, you should have seen him backpedal. I had a smile on my face the rest of the day.

7 posted on 11/01/2003 5:13:42 AM PST by Pharmboy (Dems lie 'cause they have to...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
I live in Upstate NY. All I can say is What success? Sure haven't seen Chucky or any of his success up here. But then wasn't Chucky the guy who said that he thought civilization ended west of the Hudson?
8 posted on 11/01/2003 5:15:30 AM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
The little innuendoes like this ”Mr. Schumer has used almost every maneuver available to a Senate Judiciary Committee member to block the appointment of the more controversial judges nominated by the Bush administration,

President Bush has nominated judges who have impeccable records and are constitutionalists, they rule by law not by the bench/special interest.This then makes them controversial?

As for filibusters, if done in the original manner, no one goes out of the room; if they (Dems) want to obstruct further, then I think the GOP had better lock and load!

9 posted on 11/01/2003 5:26:49 AM PST by yoe (Term Limits - and 2 terms are the limit for all elected to a Federal office!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
After all President BUSH has done to avenge 9-11 this fool now wants to play "stab you in the back."

I hope people remember this at election time, but they won't.
10 posted on 11/01/2003 5:34:09 AM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe
I couldn't agree more. The nerve of these people to deny the winning party our judicial appointments because they don't share the kill-the-fetus, grab-the-guns philosophy. The pubbies need to show backbone here--Orin Hatch has done well so far, but he can't do it all alone.
11 posted on 11/01/2003 5:35:01 AM PST by Pharmboy (Dems lie 'cause they have to...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
"Some of this has Mr. Schumer puzzled. He sees himself largely as a moderate"

OK, here is the American Conservative Union Voting Record (the lower the number, the more liberal. Jesse Helms,for instance, has 99.)

Hillary Clinton (D) - - - - - - - - - - + - - - - - - - + - 10 12 2 /Life Record - 11

Charles Schumer (D) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + + 10 16 22 /Life Record - 6

As you can see, Schumer has a more liberal voting record than Hillary. He knows he's no moderate, the liar.

And shame on the NYT for even letting him get by with saying that, without countering it.

12 posted on 11/01/2003 5:35:42 AM PST by I still care
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Chuck Schumer is a moderate the way Howard Dean is a moderate, i.e., the left-wing media wants to hoodwink centrist readers into believing that these people are not as extreme and bigoted against traditional religious believers as they truly are.
13 posted on 11/01/2003 5:40:17 AM PST by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I still care
Excellent point--thank you. The Times thnks he's a moderate because they see themselves as moderates. Crazy, no?
14 posted on 11/01/2003 5:41:10 AM PST by Pharmboy (Dems lie 'cause they have to...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
"You have to pick your shots," he [Schumer] said.

Interesting choice of words, Chuckie.

15 posted on 11/01/2003 5:44:00 AM PST by DumpsterDiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Unam Sanctam
The term “moderate” is getting a bad rap from these socialists who are claiming to be one. Schumer is a moderate the way Howard Dean is a moderate the way Mrs. Clinton is a moderate..... Moderate on Marxism; heavy on big government – totalitarianism.

Their leadership makes no bones about her Socialistic views, Pelosi never lets the US Constitution stand in her way.

16 posted on 11/01/2003 5:55:33 AM PST by yoe (Term Limits - and 2 terms are the limit for all elected to a Federal office!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Bump.
17 posted on 11/01/2003 6:05:04 AM PST by First_Salute (God save our democratic-republican government, from a government by judiciary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: I still care
Know yourself, know your enemy
A hundred battles, a hundred victories. -- Mao

If Schumer (or the Times) thinks he is moderate or in the American mainstream, he has failed Mao's first test.

However, I dispute the charge that Schumer is bigoted against Catholics. Schumer is bigoted against all who have deeply held religious beliefs, including Catholics, Protestants, Jews and Muslims. But even that list is incomplete. Now one can add Latinos, African-Americans and any others in the Rainbow Coalition who have deeply held beliefs on the sanctity of life and of marriage or in strict constructionist judicial interpretations of the U.S. Constitution.

The Times almost got it right when they quoted Michael Long of NY's Conservative Party ... "[Schumer] has a very strong bias." Unfortunately, it extends against (d)emocratic traditions that favor majority legislative decisions, the Senate's responsibility in the nomination-confirmation process to Advise and Consent, and more generally the rule of law, as we saw during the Clinton impeachment hearings.

One attention-grabbing Times quote is "Some fellow politicians and political strategists said the reaction [Schumer] has stirred clearly underscored his effectiveness in controlling the debate over the ideological shape of the nation's courts."

Clearly, the Times would not be writing this story to soften Schumer's image if the clamor by conservatives in the media and on the Internet were not having a profound effect on Schumer's reelection prospects in 2004.

18 posted on 11/01/2003 6:24:37 AM PST by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: tioga
It's idiots like "Smuck-u-mer" that keep the word hate alive.
19 posted on 11/01/2003 7:11:12 AM PST by Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sirchtruth
What would you recommend we do about it. Personally, would start out with a boycott of New York, donations to his political oponents, and donations to anything that opposes the ACLU and its agenda. Remember James Carville who with his famous words sated, "this is war."
20 posted on 11/01/2003 7:22:16 AM PST by peter the great
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson