Why don't we just ask him to pick one he really believes in, one for which he won't just slide off into another topic when it gets exposed as fraud or deliberate(?) misinterpretation?
I agree that the Burdick print and other Palauxy site prints are probably not human.
The whale's tilt is not amazing since the strata is tilted also, however it still seems likely that the whale was buried quickly to prevent decomposition.
Same thing with the Polystrate trees. The site Dimensio sent me to, acknowledges that the best explanation for polystrate trees is that the sediment formed in place around them over long periods and that they are not "misplaced". But unless I missed it , it doesn't explain why the tree didn't decompose over that long of period.
The point I was making was that there is an awful lot of wiggle room with evolution. Evolution is hard to falsify. If the results don't bear out the expected prediction, another natural explanation can easily be substituted.