[RJCogburn]

What data are that? Certainly there is some reason for existence and the universe but a 'Creator' of the kind you seem to suggest is a matter of faith, not data.

[milan]

Certainly there is some reason for existence and the universe but a 'Creator' of the kind you seem to suggest is a matter of faith, not data.

Some of the data is the data of fact that there is no possible way that the number of life forms we have on this planet and the number of positive "mutations" that would have had to take place are even remotely possible. You want to talk about faith. It takes much less faith to belive in God than it does to buy the outlandish "hey, I need to reproduce, I think I will grow a dingle" sequence.

[f.Christian]

Evolution uses existence as proof with no explanation of existence ... it happens (( big bang ))---

you 're comfortable with that gobble - gobble - turkey !

[DannyTN]

"Certainly there is some reason for existence and the universe but a 'Creator' of the kind you seem to suggest is a matter of faith, not data. "

Isn't that statement itself a statement of "faith", not data?

[Just mythoughts]

"DATA" science tells us this earth is millions of years old. The Bible speaks of "ages" one prior to "flesh man" when the dinosaurs existed.

I have a small rock on my monitor that has fossils in it and the snails in it look just like the snails I find today.

The Bible says "kind after kind" just like we see today, except when man starts adapting - mixing various "kinds".

Man who tries to make the "WORD" say, this earth is "six" thousands years old give up their credibility cause "science" can show the data that is not fact. Now "flesh man" or "man in the flesh" comes pretty close to that number but not the "age" of this earth.