If "it's turtles all the way down", or "the Great Raven regurgitated the world into being" fits the data, why not allow it as a hypothesis?
As absurd as that sounds, it doesn't strike me as any more absurd than the idea that we all evolved from pond scum or that pond scum spontaneously came into existence.
ID does however, have testible predictions such as "irreducable compexity".
Evolutionists just take it on "faith" that an answer to the complexity problem will be found.