[PatrickHenry]

I think you need some background information on exactly what a scientist means when he speaks of a "theory." Take a look at this website: Is Evolution Science?. It will help you to understand why evolution is regarded as a scientific theory, and then you will see why ID is not.

[DannyTN]

Evolutionists say ID is not falsifiable and in the same breath say that the evidence falsifies ID. Which is it? "Take a look at this website"

Well I looked at the website, but I'm not impressed. While being far from an expert, I understand that the whale ancestor is based on a fossil fragment that is disputed as a bonified evolutionary fossil. So how many other of those "predictions" are either bogus or made to fit the facts?

ID makes predictions too. I posted that table in the last thread and at least 3 or the 4 predictions, the theory of Design fit better than the theory of evolution.