[Held_to_Ransom]

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1962 that the teaching of creationism in public schools is a violation of the separation of church and state

Well then, what's the problem for these lefties? Darwin was very definitely a creationist.

[f.Christian]

River city !

To: f.Christian

Dakmar...

I took a few minutes to decipher that post, and I must say I agree with a lot of what you said.

fC...

These were the Classical liberals...founding fathers-PRINCIPLES---stable/SANE scientific reality/society---industrial progress...moral/social character-values(private/personal) GROWTH(limited NON-intrusive PC Govt/religion---schools)!

Dakmar...

Where you and I diverge is on the Evolution/Communism thing. You seem to view Darwin and evolution as the beginning of the end for enlighted, moral civilization, while I think Marx, class struggle, and the "dictatorship of the proletariat" are the true dangers.

God bless you, I think we both have a common enemy in the BRAVE-NWO.

452 posted on 9/7/02 8:54 PM Pacific by Dakmar

[Dimensio]

Darwin was very definitely a creationist.

So? A concept is not religious just because it was thought up by a religious person. Issac Newton's theories aren't religious in nature just because he was a devout Christian (and Alchemist, but that's another matter).

[Stultis]

Darwin was very definitely a creationist.

For part of his life, he was. But he abandonded special creation some time in his mid-thirties, and the idea of mediated creation some time later during middle age.