Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No Plan? Go it Alone? 'Humbug,' Rumsfeld Says
DoD - American Forces Press Service ^ | Oct. 31, 2003 | Linda D. Kozaryn

Posted on 10/31/2003 4:12:08 PM PST by Ragtime Cowgirl

American Forces Press Service

No Plan? Go it Alone? 'Humbug,' Rumsfeld Says

By Linda D. Kozaryn
American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, Oct. 31, 2003 – When Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld gives a speech, people listen. When he responds to people's questions, they really listen.

Unfettered by prepared remarks, Rumsfeld tells it the way he sees it – with style, Rumsfeld style.

Last night, for example, the secretary spoke at the 10th anniversary of the founding of Empower America, a group devoted to ensuring government actions foster growth, economic well-being, freedom and individual responsibility.

Rumsfeld received Empower America's Freedom Award for distinguished public service during a dinner for about 250 senior government, business and civic leaders at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

The secretary's formal remarks focused on the U.S.-led coalition's success in Iraq. He said the media's reports of "doom and gloom" don't tell the whole story. While U.S. and coalition forces in Iraq are dealing with a "difficult, dangerous and complicated" situation, there has been impressive progress and the nation should be proud of its accomplishments.

At the conclusion of his prepared remarks, Rumsfeld said he'd be "happy to respond to some easy questions."

One man asked if the administration's concerted effort to get the word out on the progress being made has been effective.

"I don't know that I'm the best judge," Rumsfeld candidly replied. "I will say I have seen an increasing number of stories about things that are, in fact, happening there."

But, he added, he hasn't seen the press ask any "pushback" questions when people make such claims as there was "no plan" for post-war Iraq.

"How in the world do you get 100,000 Iraqis (security personnel) trained, out in the street – 85 of them are dead because they're helping defend the security of their country – 85 dead in a matter of three months – how does that happen with no plan?"

Yet, the "no plan" argument, he said, "has been beaten and beaten and beaten. No media people have ever stopped and said, 'What are you talking about, "no plan?"' It just goes on and on and creates a life of its own."

Rumsfeld also dealt with the idea that the United States went into Iraq on its own.

"Go it alone. I've heard that. 'We should not go it alone. America is wrong to go it alone.' What nonsense," Rumsfeld said. "We've got 32 countries involved in Iraq with forces there. The Polish and Spanish division has 17 countries involved alone.

"We didn't go alone," he stressed. "President Bush made the decision to go to the United Nations. There've been two resolutions passed. NATO is supporting the Polish and the Spanish division.

"We have 90 nations engaged in one of the largest coalitions in the history of mankind – engaged in the global war on terrorism," he continued. "Yet we hear it over and over – 'It should be internationalized. We shouldn't go it alone.'

"We're not going it alone," the secretary concluded. "We have gone out -- before the war had started -- and began talking to countries and said, 'In the event that Iraq does not acquiesce in the requirements the United Nations has imposed, would you like to participate and in what way?'"

Rumseld said he was "struck by the no-plan thing," particularly when he saw a newspaper article that said the "Defense Department and the U.S. government had been working with the World Food Program for weeks and weeks and weeks before the war started." The risk of humanitarian crisis is a factor in the planning process, he said.

Too often, he said, news reporters have "the next question" in their minds "instead of listening to the answer that they're getting to the prior question, and then respond to that in a way that forces people to justify statements like those."

Another guest asked Rumsfeld to respond to reports that troop morale in Iraq is low, the troops want to come home, and they don't know why they're there.

"If you take 130,000 young men and young women," the secretary said, "you're bound to find, across the entire spectrum, someone that's got a circumstance at home and they want to be home. And God bless them, you can't blame them for wanting to be home.

"You're going to find someone who didn't get a hot meal that day," he said. "You're going to find someone who had a problem with his boss in the platoon."

On the other hand, Rumsfeld said, people who've visited Iraq find the troops "know what they're doing. They know why they're there. They're proud of what they've accomplished. They also have the wonderful opportunity to feel the energy that comes to them from the Iraqi people. The Iraqi people respond to them."

There are between 1,500 and 2,000 patrols or activities a day across Iraq, he said. "There are maybe 10, 15, or 20 incidents a day somewhere in that enormous country where either we precipitate it, or someone attacks our forces. They last an average of about a minute and a half."

All the rest of the time, Rumsfeld said, the troops are out there digging wells, helping the Iraqi people fix up hospitals, putting in generators and other things that help the Iraqi people "and the Iraqi people know it."

"When you walk down the street, the people come up and they are thankful," he said. "When you fly over in a helicopter, they come out in the courtyard and wave."

"Is everyone for us? No. Does everyone want to be free and not go back to the Baathists? No. There are a handful of those folks that want to go back to the Baathists, no question about it. And they're tough, and they've got weapons, and they've got explosives, and they're killing people."

Rumsfeld said the best part of his job is being with the troops, because they have so much pride and confidence in their country. They are sure what's being done is right.

He said even the seriously wounded troops he visits at Walter Reed Army Medical Center and Bethesda Naval Hospital are proud of their units, their service.

"They are so proud of their country and they're aware of the importance of what they're doing. I just feel an enormous gratitude that we've got so many wonderful people who are willing to raise their hands and say, 'Send me' and they do it with such wonderful skill and courage and compassion."



TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: award; empoweramerica; rumsfeld
Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld Empower America 10th Anniversary Dinner Remarks
1 posted on 10/31/2003 4:12:09 PM PST by Ragtime Cowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MJY1288; Calpernia; Grampa Dave; anniegetyourgun; Ernest_at_the_Beach; BOBTHENAILER; ...
Unfettered by prepared remarks, Rumsfeld tells it the way he sees it – with style, Rumsfeld style.

~~~
Rummy, ping!
~~~

If you want on or off my Pro-Coalition ping list, please Freepmail me. Warning: it is a high volume ping list on good days. (Most days are good days).

2 posted on 10/31/2003 4:14:08 PM PST by Ragtime Cowgirl ("Saddam Hussein is not running Iraq. He is not butchering tens of thousands of people." Rummy,10/27)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
This guy is so cool, do you remember, during the war, when people would crowd around the television during his press briefings?

He was, is and will be a National treasure and no amount of re-writing of history will undo his reputation.
3 posted on 10/31/2003 4:19:22 PM PST by PeteFromMontana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl; LTCJ; anniegetyourgun; aristeides
This is an excellent article, and again it is a lesson in how the military prepares for war.

They've got contingency plans for things I never even thought about. Every operation is painstakingly planned down to the lowest levels. Every opplan has in it a variety of appendices and annexes that cover specific areas.

There is NO OPPLAN, brigade or higher, that goes forward without a series of annexes/appendices regarding civil/military relations, reconstruction, etc. post-war. It simply doesn't happen.

Not to mention the fact that many of these items are trained for over and over again and are a matter of military doctrine.

In short, the notion that there was "no plan" about the aftermath of the "high intensity conflict" period is ridiculous. The progress that has taken place is evident of a detailed plan. Rummy is right about that.

I will only fault the administration with not more agressively pursuing the telling of their own PR story. Something is broken in the WH communications office.
4 posted on 10/31/2003 5:38:18 PM PST by xzins (Proud to be Army!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
They are missing Karen Hughes, who is only doing spot contract work.
5 posted on 10/31/2003 5:39:36 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
And Ari Fleischer, who was the best.

Ari....come home.
6 posted on 10/31/2003 5:48:54 PM PST by xzins (Proud to be Army!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
As I said on another thread, the earlier part of the opertion may have gone faster than anticipated but the rebuilding was carefully thought out and is being executed.
7 posted on 10/31/2003 6:06:19 PM PST by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Thanks for the post and God Bless Donald Rumsfield!
8 posted on 10/31/2003 6:24:43 PM PST by RAY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
I must admit that, while I'm not a "Bushbot", I am a student of "strategery". And while I pride myself on my skepticism of public officials, I am an unapologetic "Rummy". That guy is just too cool.
9 posted on 10/31/2003 6:52:46 PM PST by Imal ("Fun Size" candy isn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Bump!
10 posted on 10/31/2003 7:44:49 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
"How in the world do you get 100,000 Iraqis (security personnel) trained, out in the street – 85 of them are dead because they're helping defend the security of their country – 85 dead in a matter of three months – how does that happen with no plan?"

The "no plan" criticism is one of the most absurd the Dems continue to make. Edwards, Dean, Lieberman...well the whole bunch can't seem to bark it out enough. They are all minor men by experience and wisdom when compared to Rumsfeld.

11 posted on 10/31/2003 7:48:04 PM PST by Dolphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I believe one policy or another requires that the DOD maintain a "library" of plans to respond to attacks or hostile actions by virtually every country. I'd bet there is a plan for "what if Canada attacks?" That's obviously not going to happen, but I do know that the U.S. used to conduct surveillance on most every country, including countries like Great Britain; probably still does.

Those attack plans are periodically reviewed, probably more frequently depending on the threat level of the country in question, and refreshed for new conditions including a changed Air Order of Battle as an example.
12 posted on 10/31/2003 7:54:51 PM PST by Chu Gary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
And to think that the American taxpayer has to foot the bill for this propagandistic claptrap! The Cult of Rummy, perpetuated by government-paid hacks. Why are conservatives posting such self-serving nonsense?
13 posted on 10/31/2003 8:29:16 PM PST by Justin Raimondo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justin Raimondo
Justin, you're boring us. Same old line, over and over.
14 posted on 10/31/2003 8:46:01 PM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
"No media people have ever stopped and said, 'What are you talking about.."

At least he's taking a swing at all these so-called "reporters" who let Dems get away with making statements unsupported by fact.

Someone FINALLY did have the guts to ask one of the candidates about Iraq: "what would you do instead?". The response was terrifying "Turn it over to the UN".
15 posted on 11/01/2003 2:47:13 AM PST by Fenris6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justin Raimondo
Justin, Rumsfeld has been a champion wrestler, outstanding Navy pilot, NATO chief, White House Chief of Staff, Mideast envoy, has turned three major corporations around with no previous experience of pharmaceuticals, broadband or fibre-optics (not to mention his fine work at Gilead Sciences), is cheered like a pop icon when he visits the troops, and is also a brilliant, charismatic and informative speaker. Find me a Democrat in the field of ten with that CV ...
16 posted on 11/01/2003 6:54:03 AM PST by zilberzee (Mojo Magic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dolphy
Yes. The best way to learn about his vast wealth of experience and his awesome career is at the Department of Defnse website under transcripts in an interview with Rowan Scarborough. This 15-page interview gives a taste of Rumsfeld's accomplishments. His good record as a four-term Congressman is also notable, especially on civil rights. He gave a young Dick Parsons, now head of Time Warner, his first opportunity in DC at the White House in the days when African Americans had a miserable struggle. When Rummy was US Ambassador to NATO he even ran with the bulls at Pamplona! -- ping -- wonder if Kucinich has ever done that??
he is 'one off' for sure.
17 posted on 11/01/2003 7:02:02 AM PST by zilberzee (Mojo Magic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Rumsfeld Is The Man!
18 posted on 11/01/2003 7:26:49 AM PST by blackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Justin Raimondo
Don't let the facts get in the way of your worldview.
19 posted on 11/01/2003 9:21:00 AM PST by ellery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Bump!
20 posted on 11/01/2003 9:00:46 PM PST by windchime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson