To: gcruse
Well, Gary, I agree with you that Bush is more of a centrist. I realize that people will see us calling him a centrist as an "attack" (LOL), but that raises interesting issues, as well.
If people's reaction to a Republican being called a centrist is bad, then why do they elect centrists? Does that negative reaction assume that people want Republicans to be right-of-center (or strict) conservatives? Interesting.
32 posted on
10/31/2003 8:40:24 AM PST by
Cathryn Crawford
(Algunos misterios son tan profundos y maravillosos que deben ser explorados para ser entendido.)
To: Cathryn Crawford
Well, Gary, I agree with you that Bush is more of a centrist. I realize that people will see us calling him a centrist as an "attack" (LOL), but that raises interesting issues, as well No you are still young, some day when you get into the real world.
To paraphrase Churchill or Lady Thatcher, the same basic quote has been attributed to both.
When you are young and not idealogical you have no heart, when you are 40 and still idealogical you have no head.
Notice everbody, I said "paraphrase".
38 posted on
10/31/2003 8:44:47 AM PST by
Dane
To: Cathryn Crawford
Does that negative reaction assume that people want Republicans to be right-of-center (or strict) conservatives?
In modern times, candidates run from the center, then govern from their extremes, for want of a better word.
Bush seems to have stood that on its head. He ran on conservative strengths, but governs from the center.
Maybe that's how you get re-elected, by pulling in the uncommitted who voted against you last time. Since the country is so evenly split, staying on your own side of the fence might lead to perpetually anemic domestic government, not that there's anything wrong with that. ;)
45 posted on
10/31/2003 8:48:40 AM PST by
gcruse
(http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson