[William McKinley]

True. Because they are mostly completely unrelated. However, evolution and creationism are not completely unrelated. Both are trying to answer "where did we come from".

Calculus and Shakespear aren't trying to answer the same thing, unless by some strange twist of fate the answer to "to be or not to be" is actually the integral of sine theta delta theta.

[rdb3]

I admire you for stepping into this fray. I'm on the Creation side, BTW.

I'll take these scientists seriously (since they tend to be atheistic in their approach) when they can empirically rule out the existence of God.

Until then, I'll just enjoy their rather entertaining reasoning.

[Dimensio]

However, evolution and creationism are not completely unrelated. Both are trying to answer "where did we come from".

The problem, however, is that evolution is science while creationism is typically religion. There is some debate as to how evolution occured, but the debate is over minor details. There are countless creation stories, many of them wildly different.