Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: William McKinley
There are no dominant scientific countertheories to evolution.

If there were, I'd say, go for it.

ID is not a scientific theory, not even close, and creationism is religion.

So what dominant scientific theory that competes with evolution do you know about that I don't?

If you can name one, I will fight right alongside you to get it included within the scientific curriculum.
22 posted on 10/30/2003 7:53:17 PM PST by Ogmios (Since when is 66 senate votes for judicial confirmations constitutional?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Ogmios
There are no dominant scientific countertheories to evolution.
Why do they have to be scientific theories? Besides, there is always going to be bleeding of educational disciplines into others. Try separating some scientific discussions about genetics away from ethics which is tied directly to sociology and history and culture. It can't be done. There is no need to that tightly segment education.
27 posted on 10/30/2003 8:02:29 PM PST by William McKinley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson