Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jennyp
I think it's unfair to analogize from Marx to theories of Intelligent Design. Yes, ID hasn't advanced very far since Thomas Aquinas, back in the Middle Ages.

Yet - science can't rule God out, by definition. True science cannot measure God, thus, must be agnostic when it comes to God. So, depending on the curriculum, there is a place for that to be said.
17 posted on 10/30/2003 7:34:47 PM PST by CobaltBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: CobaltBlue
I think it's unfair to analogize from Marx to theories of Intelligent Design.

I hear ya. I'm thinking more of how much scientific & logical support they both have, compared to the alternatives.

True science cannot measure God, thus, must be agnostic when it comes to God. So, depending on the curriculum, there is a place for that to be said.

Fair enough. But the debate in the country's school boards is all around what should go into the science curriculums & textbooks. Whenever somebody proposes a compromise to put ID in a comparative religion class, the ID activists always reject that.

25 posted on 10/30/2003 7:58:21 PM PST by jennyp (http://crevo.bestmessageboard.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson