To: bondserv
Anything I say in response will drag this away from the issue of whether crevo threads should be allowed on FR at all.
407 posted on
11/01/2003 6:00:55 PM PST by
Nataku X
(Praise the Lord! May Terri recover from her starvation ordeal; may her parents become her guardians.)
To: Nakatu X
That is not the question, because any thread can end up as a discussion of evolution, the question is how to handle conflict evenly. It is glaringly apparent that Creationists are looked at in a demeaning manner.
408 posted on
11/01/2003 6:05:00 PM PST by
AndrewC
To: Nakatu X
There are many scientific endeavors that bleed over into the ethical realm. As our technology gets more advanced we are seeing a host of "scary" pathways being chosen by men and women who have relativistic morals.
Think of the drugs that can kill a child in the womb. The issues surrounding embryonic manipulations relating to the life of humans in the early stage of development. The cloning of persons for harvesting purposes. The ability to alter genetic material to custom design a persons intelligence and appearance.
If our scientific community does not regard a Creator, because their professor's have called Him a Myth, we can be certain that the decisions they will make will be perverted from the guidelines set by God.
We must inject conservative morals into all debates, in order to maintain an ethical perspective on where our future will take us. Liberals have chosen to fight this till the end, and as evidenced by many responses here, there is a desire to evict those bounds from debate on this forum.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson