Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TaxRelief
Fox was the attorney representing Michael in the medical malpractice suit. Nothing he said to reporters can have any real relevance. It's interesting that he still brags that they won 6.8 million dollars.

Hmm, this is very interesting. I haven't read all the comments yet, but has anyone else wondered as I am if that really was the amount awarded to MS?

Is it certain that he received only 1.2 million?

199 posted on 10/30/2003 8:34:50 PM PST by texasbluebell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]


To: texasbluebell
The $6.8 million dollars could very well be the total amount awarded...as one of the doctors settled out of court for an "undisclosed amount of money".
202 posted on 10/30/2003 8:48:40 PM PST by TSH1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]

To: texasbluebell
I thought the 6.8 million was the total award, which they decreased to 1.2 million because the jury felt that Terri was 70% responsible for her own condition.
212 posted on 10/30/2003 10:12:04 PM PST by Ohioan from Florida
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]

To: texasbluebell
There had to be a lot more. There were settlements with other parties and he did receive seperate damages for pain and suffering. They did appeal the jury reduction. What was the result of that appeal?
230 posted on 10/31/2003 3:39:16 AM PST by TaxRelief (Ask me about the connection between Socialism, Communism, Drug Warlords and Vodka.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]

To: texasbluebell
This is from Terri's site:

Question 2: How Did the Money Get Into Terri’s Medical Fund?

November 1992: A medical malpractice trial is petitioned by Terri's husband, Michael Schiavo. He asks the jury for 20 million dollars to pay for his wife’s (Terri) future medical and neurological requirements. This request was based on estimates of her life expectancy, which Michael Schiavo and his attorneys were estimating at 50 years.
(MY COMMENTS: $20M divided by 50 yrs = $400,000 per year. The jury decided because of Terri's supposed bulemia, her life expectancy would only have been 17 more years. Therefore, $400,000 x 17 yrs = $6.8M. This matches the figure from the lawyers website. If you then subtract 70% for Terri's supposed "attributable negligence", you come up with an actual judgement of $2.04M from this lawsuit.)

However, this is from the same page on Terri's website:

Question 1: How Much Was Originally Awarded To Terri’s Medical Fund?

Medical Malpractice Trial Jury Award

November 10, 1992 : Jury Document, Item 5. What is the amount of Theresa Schiavo's future damages for medical expenses and lost earning ability to be sustained in future years?

A.) Total damages over future years: $9,400,000.00
B.) The number of years over which those future damages are intended to provide compensation: 17 years
C.) What is the present value of those future damages: $4,300,000.00

Note: The jury award amount was reduced to $1,290,000.00 to reflect Terri’s attributable negligence. Separate from these monies was Michael Schiavo’s personal award of $600,000.00.

(My comments: $9.4M x 30% = $1.29M actually awarded.)

More from this page on Terri's site:

Prior to this trial and in a completely independent medical malpractice lawsuit, Terri was awarded $250,000.00 in an out-of-court settlement. Also, prior to the two medical malpractice lawsuits, an estimated $50,000.00 was contributed to Terri’s medical fund via community fundraisers.

In Summary, Terri has received an aggregate sum of $1,590,000.00. Nonetheless, in June of 1993, the asset balance in Terri’s account was reduced to $761, 507.50, as reported by Michael Schiavo. Schiavo's attorney, however, has sealed the accounting, which would disclose how Terri's account was depleted by approximately $828,492.50, (52%) in only 1 year and 6 months.

My comments: Although exact figures seem to vary, I think the lawyer reporting a $6.8M judgement isn't exactly truthful. I think actual money to Terri from judgements is $1.54M.
336 posted on 10/31/2003 11:31:58 AM PST by iowamomforfreedom (Why is it illegal to starve an animal but not a human being?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson