[Lazamataz]

But look at the modern paleocon movement. I really don't see any professional writer who's a paleocon who doesn't at least have a tinge of anti-Semitism.

Strictly speaking, it is not anti-semitism to be opposed to some of Israel's policies. Israel has made some terrific blunders in very recent times.

And to be fair to Paleo's, it's much more that they are anti-interventionist than it is that they are anti-Israel.

[AmishDude]

I agree with you. Paleos are non-interventionists and stick to it. But you find that the paleo writers (a) almost never write about Kashmir, for example, (b) criticize everything Israel does and (c) tend to talk about Israeli politics even when there's no issue of US involvement.

[anotherview]

Actually, each paleocon writer and/or commentator I read starts out with anti-Israeli views and branches out to pure anti-Semetism eventually. There is unabashed anti-Semetism (read hatred of Jews, not just Israel) in the Sobran article, and I have heard/read similar from Buchanan.