Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats bend ears at Justice Department (Whining RATs Alert)
AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF ^ | Thursday, October 30, 2003 | By Chuck Lindell

Posted on 10/30/2003 5:43:13 AM PST by Arrowhead1952

Representatives claim newly drawn congressional districts violate the law


By Chuck Lindell

AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF

Thursday, October 30, 2003

WASHINGTON -- Texas Democrats, meeting Wednesday with Justice Department lawyers, declared that the state's newly drawn congressional districts should be tossed out because they reduce minority voting strength.

The nine Democrats, from districts with heavy concentrations of African American and Hispanic voters, sought to refute Republican claims that the GOP-drawn map creates 11 minority-controlled districts, unchanged from the previous map. Looking at the same numbers, Democrats see 10 districts where minority voters can determine election results, a decline that would violate the Voting Rights Act.

"They made a situation worse," said U.S. Rep. Charlie Gonzalez, D-San Antonio, a participant in Wednesday's meeting. "They're going backwards despite claims that they added or created a new Hispanic district. That proves not to be the case when you look at it more carefully."

U.S. Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson, who represents a strongly African American and Hispanic district in Dallas, was unable to attend because of a scheduling conflict.

Instead, she'll join this morning's meeting, when Justice Department officials will receive six other Texas representatives from districts where minorities can influence elections, including U.S. Rep. Lloyd Doggett, D-Austin, and Chet Edwards, D-Waco.

Doggett said he will discuss the new map's impact on many of Travis County's minority voters, who were placed in districts that extend to the Mexican border or Houston.

"This plan was directed at dividing our community and destroying the very success and opportunities that minorities have to prevail within our community and contribute to it," Doggett said.

Democratic state officials and minority group representatives will make similar pleas to the agency this afternoon.

Under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, Texas must seek Department of Justice approval, known as preclearance, before changing any voting procedure. The agency must certify that the change does not leave minority voters worse off.

Republicans criticized the congressional meetings as an attempt to unduly exert influence on the agency.

"It would be inappropriate if they are attempting to intimidate, strong-arm or lobby Justice Department people to protect their own seats," said Jonathan Grella, spokesman for House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, R-Sugar Land. "And they say they are doing this in the name of minority representation, but they are doing it in the name of saving their own political hides. Clearly, the Republican plan boosts minority participation, and any assertion to the contrary is dishonest."

Gonzalez noted that the Justice Department review includes taking public comment.

"Anybody and everybody can get in there and put in their two cents worth, and I'm sure that they will," he said. "It is our obligation and responsibility to . . . explain the impact on the minority districts."

Texas Secretary of State Geoffrey Connor submitted the map and supporting documents to the Justice Department on Oct. 20, and the agency has 60 days to respond.

Doggett said he expects to appeal to the professionalism of the agency's staff.

"Despite the heavily politicized nature of the Justice Department under John Ashcroft, I believe that there are some career civil servants who will want to do justice on this map, and it cries out for rejection under the Voting Rights Act," he said.

A Justice Department spokesman did not return a call seeking comment.


TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: daustin; democrats; doggett; doj; minoritycontrolled; resistricting; texas
Here we go again. The RATs just will never admit they are not the majority in Texas for the present time. Hopefully, they will NEVER AGAIN be the majority.
1 posted on 10/30/2003 5:43:13 AM PST by Arrowhead1952
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952

2 posted on 10/30/2003 5:44:52 AM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; Khepera; elwoodp; MAKnight; condolinda; mafree; Trueblackman; FRlurker; Teacher317; ...
Black conservative ping

If you want on (or off) of my black conservative ping list, please let me know via FREEPmail. (And no, you don't have to be black to be on the list!)

Extra warning: this is a high-volume ping list.

3 posted on 10/30/2003 5:45:54 AM PST by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952
No problem. Run a minority conservative Republican in a Gerrymandered district that will insure his election against a white liberal. The Dems will then get just what they want. One more minority. :) :) :) :) :)

I love the smell of burning liberals in the morning, it smells like VICTORY!
4 posted on 10/30/2003 7:09:34 AM PST by cpdiii (RPH, Oil field Trash and proud of it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii
I love the smell of burning liberals and TROLLS in the morning, it smells like VICTORY!
5 posted on 10/30/2003 8:15:02 AM PST by Arrowhead1952 (Ban dumbocRATs forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952
Umm, the last time we insisted that minorities all lived near each other and in districts other than where whites lived, we called it segregation, and decided it was bad.
Why is it good now? What are the minorities going to get other than Congressfolk who have minority status (can't vote in a bleeping thing without white support).

It's good for the white Dems, because these are sure Dem votes. And they don't have to trade anything for them.

6 posted on 10/30/2003 6:27:19 PM PST by speekinout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson