To: fiesti; STOCKHRSE; Devil_Anse; All
I think MPD led us all to believe, at first, that there was no clothing with the exception of a maternity bra. I believe Ray might have indicated though, that whatever evidence prosecution has with respect to what remnants of clothing were found, that defense has also. That would probably mean that they both have "experts" to testify about the remnant clothing, wouldn't it? Surely, if they're fighting about ONE hair, they'll be fighting furiously about remnant clothing found with a dismembered or partial body (whatever you may want to call it). Another, JMO. I could use a LOT of legal expertise here!
To: Sandylapper
Sandy I think a lot of it will come down to common sense not legalise!!
144 posted on
10/30/2003 5:08:45 PM PST by
Canadian Outrage
(All us Western Canuks belong South)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson