Skip to comments.
One general's jihad
Boston Globe ^
| 10/30/03
| editorial
Posted on 10/30/2003 4:50:10 AM PST by RJCogburn
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:10:58 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
AT A TIME when one violent attack after another points up the failure of US military intelligence in Iraq to gather information about the shadowy forces mounting the assaults, the Defense Department should at least make sure that its top intelligence officer can work well with officials from Iraq and neighboring countries. But the deputy undersecretary for intelligence is Lieutenant General William Boykin, who has made a practice of slandering the Islamic faith.
(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: boykin; williamboykin
I believe there were at least two more airplanes," he has said, "that were headed for major installations in this country. I believe that there was one headed for the White House, and there was one headed for the Capitol, but they were thwarted by the hand of God." I had not heard that one before. If correct, this general is an even bigger nutcase than I thought.
1
posted on
10/30/2003 4:50:10 AM PST
by
RJCogburn
To: RJCogburn
I believe there has been speculation that more planes may have been in the original plan,but,for whatever reason did not get hijacked and crashed.
2
posted on
10/30/2003 4:53:14 AM PST
by
John W
To: John W
To be clear-did not get hijacked by and then crashed into something by terrorists,but,landed safely when all planes were ordered down.
3
posted on
10/30/2003 4:54:21 AM PST
by
John W
To: RJCogburn
Lieutenant General William Boykin, who has made a practice of slandering the Islamic faith. As I understand it, the truth is an absolute defense to a charge of slander.
4
posted on
10/30/2003 5:01:28 AM PST
by
Salvey
To: John W
Indeed, it's not unlikely there may have been more teams of hijackers that did not get a chance to act because of the FAA order. I wonder if the FBI has looked at all flight manifests on that day to try to deduce the existence of more teams - certainly the airlines would have had those records? It could give them a picture of al Qaeda teams in the US now.
5
posted on
10/30/2003 5:05:02 AM PST
by
astounded
To: RJCogburn
Typical Globe lies and Marxist crap.
Contact the Globe:
617) 929-3025
6
posted on
10/30/2003 5:23:02 AM PST
by
pabianice
To: astounded
After the various excuses and explanations that have evolved since 9/11, I doubt if Boyken can be dismissed as a fruitcake. It seems to me that he may be onto something that the rest of us are not. I am very suspect of the peaceful and loving nature of the Muslim faith after reading the Koran. It seems to me that calling a spade a spade is to be contrary to our politically correct philosophy at the present time. If you can't express your feelings without an investigation, what happened to our First Amendment?
7
posted on
10/30/2003 5:35:18 AM PST
by
meenie
To: RJCogburn
But Bush would do better to fire Boykin and deprive anti-American propagandists in the Muslim world Oh, that's just silly. As if the Muslims need some provocation beyond the fact that they are already committed to the destruction of western civilation.
It would be better for all of us if we could do something to deprive the anti-American propagandists at the Boston Globe of food for their agit-prop machine.
Hiding behind the facade of being concerned for the feelings of the "Muslim world" is pretty phony, IMHO. The editors at the GLOB should just fess up to the fact that they absolutely hate Republicans in general, and President Bush in particular, period. The rest of us can see that.
8
posted on
10/30/2003 5:38:24 AM PST
by
Kenton
To: John W
I believe there has been speculation that more planes may have been in the original plan,but,for whatever reason did not get hijacked and crashed. Right. I am referring to the general's explanation of why they did not.
9
posted on
10/30/2003 8:39:42 AM PST
by
RJCogburn
("I want a man with grit."..................Mattie Ross of near Dardenelle in Yell County)
To: RJCogburn
Well,the critical part of that statement you quoted is "I believe..".And,he is allowed to.
10
posted on
10/30/2003 10:00:38 AM PST
by
John W
To: John W
I agree. I did not mean to imply that I necessarily am in complete agreement with the editorial writer.
11
posted on
10/30/2003 1:08:04 PM PST
by
RJCogburn
("You have my thanks and, with certain reservations, my respect.".......Lawyer J. Noble Daggett)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson