[yoswif]

If any federal prosecutor in Southern California had sufficient courage, they'd get a federal grand jury to look at the forest service bureaucracy, "environmental groups", and politicians that have produced this "the only good trees are dead, dying, or spewing smoke" federal forest management policy. Was mismanagement deliberate for the purpose of increasing management costs? Who benefits from increased management costs? Was mismanagement deliberate to make well managed foreign government, corporate, and privately owned forests more valuable? Who pays politicians and "environmental groups" to promote disastrous environmental policies on federal forest land?

What federal forest managers, "environmental groups", and powerful politicians are doing to federal forests for the financial benefit of themselves, as well as foreign government, corporate, and private forest land owners, should be seen as fraud and a criminal conspiracy.

[farmfriend]

Have you talked to Carry_Okie? Or read Carry_okie's book? If not, you should.

[logic101.net]

Hang on here. The forest service does not like the rules that have been handed to them. They have no choice but to obey them though. Look to elected officials, not the guys with the rusty chain saws.

Mark A Sity