To: Henrietta; Arkinsaw
"no part of any treaty has been held unconstitutional by the Supreme Court" (The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States, 1992, Kermit L. Hall, ed., p. 878).
Go read. It's good for you.
179 posted on
11/02/2003 5:18:10 PM PST by
Chad Fairbanks
(The Truth is to see The Gift)
To: Chad Fairbanks
Just because a treaty has not yet been found unconstitutional does not mean that treaties do not violate the constitution. There are many laws in force today that even you would believe are unconstitutional. Yet they remain.
Either we all deserve equal protection under the law, or we don't. You can't have it both ways.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson