Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Henrietta; Arkinsaw
"no part of any treaty has been held unconstitutional by the Supreme Court" (The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States, 1992, Kermit L. Hall, ed., p. 878).

Go read. It's good for you.
179 posted on 11/02/2003 5:18:10 PM PST by Chad Fairbanks (The Truth is to see The Gift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]


To: Chad Fairbanks
Just because a treaty has not yet been found unconstitutional does not mean that treaties do not violate the constitution. There are many laws in force today that even you would believe are unconstitutional. Yet they remain.

Either we all deserve equal protection under the law, or we don't. You can't have it both ways.
182 posted on 11/02/2003 5:23:42 PM PST by Henrietta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson