Skip to comments.
Bill Would Make Colleges Report Legacies and Early Admissions
Wall Street Journal ^
| October 29, 2003
| Daniel Golden
Posted on 10/29/2003 8:34:19 AM PST by Recourse
Edited on 04/22/2004 11:50:13 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in June upholding affirmative action in college admissions appeared to quell the growing clamor against other admissions preferences that favor white applicants.
But now the movement to curb so-called white affirmative action has re-emerged, in Congress.
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: admissions; highereducation; preferences; tedkennedy
I oppose affirmative action in every form, but making colleges submit their legacy admissions to the federal government is an gross overreach. As far as I am concerned, if you are going to force colleges to admit minority applicants who wouldn't otherwise qualify, then the colleges should be able to admit wealthy applicants who wouldn't otherwise qualify.
1
posted on
10/29/2003 8:34:19 AM PST
by
Recourse
To: Recourse
There is a big difference between the two preferences: The constitution does not prohibt preferences for legacies. It does prohibt racial discrimination.
2
posted on
10/29/2003 9:24:38 AM PST
by
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along.)
To: Recourse
Economic status would be measured by a student's eligibility for Pell grants, a form of federal financial aid. So it sounds like what they are going to do is make kids who don't want Pell grants fill out the Pell grant applications anyway, meaning every parent who wants to send his/her kid to college must disclose all his tax info to the school.
3
posted on
10/29/2003 9:25:38 AM PST
by
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along.)
To: Recourse
"College admission systems should promote diversity, reward achievement, and be fair," said Sen. Kennedy, ranking Democrat on the Senate education committee. Of course, unless it involves Fat Teddy, the cheater and dullard.
To: Recourse
I agree. One "little" difference between legacy preferences and racial ones is that the latter are, oh, unconstitutional and a Title VI violation.
5
posted on
10/29/2003 9:35:16 AM PST
by
pogo101
To: Recourse
This is more of the Bubba Third Way BS: Equal opportunity for all, special privilege for none. Except him and his, of course. I wonder what the current POTUS thinks of this.
Should private schools be allowed to do whatever they want in regards to admissions? Oh yeah. They can't do that because they accept federal $$$$$$$$$$, and, therefore, they must do as the federal $$$$ dictates.
6
posted on
10/29/2003 9:42:36 AM PST
by
petitfour
Comment #7 Removed by Moderator
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson