Cheney's hawks 'hijacking policy' (“George Bush isn't in control! The country's been hijacked!”)

Sydney Morning Herald ^ | October 30, 2003 | Ritt Goldstein

[AxelPaulsenJr]

A barf alert would be nice on pieces like this.

[dead]

A barf alert would be nice on pieces like this.

If you can’t discern that from the title I posted, I think you may be in over your head on this forum.

[Texas Federalist]

I wish Cheney hijacked the White House. Then we wouldn't be paying out our a** for all these new government programs.

[AxelPaulsenJr]

LOL whatever! Nice color. I still think you are a du troll.

[AxelPaulsenJr]

After yet another bloody day in Iraq, Bush may have to cut and run

Sydney Morning Herald ^ | October 30, 2003 | Marian Wilkinson

Posted on 10/29/2003 6:51 AM PST by dead

What about this title makes it obvious that this is a barf hit piece?

[dead]

I still think you are a du troll.

I am. Deep undercover though, so don’t tell anybody.

[moyden2000]

Anti-American hate rag. Don't waste your time.

[dead]

That's not the title of this thread. Why didn't you ask me on that thread?

Besides, if you really can't correctly guess what the tone of an article titled, "After yet another bloody day in Iraq, Bush may have to cut and run" is likely to be, you really are in over your head.

I never put "barf alerts" in the titles of threads I post. Unlike other people, I assume a certain basic level of reading comprehension amongst Freepers that enables them to form their own opinions on articles without me holding their hand and telling them whether or not they should agree with it.

Your posts may lead me to reconsider that assumption.

[Britton J Wingfield]

I don't think that DU even existed when 'dead' started posting to FR.

'Barf Alerts' are silly, imho.

[AxelPaulsenJr]

You know I was going to apologize for my failure to read the title correctly. But your holier than thou attitude makes me say just one thing:

[dead]

Finally, you've expressed yourself clearly!

You are obviously better suited to communicating via pictures than you are to words.

Stick to the "Caption this" threads and you’ll do fine.

[TADSLOS]

Ms Kwiatkowski said the pursuit of national security decisions often bypassed "civil service and active-duty military professionals", and was handled instead by political appointees who shared common ideological ties.

Ms Alphabet needs to take in some fresh air with a walk on the mall in D.C. I recommend she review the U.S. Constitution housed nearby. She should pay particular attention to Article II and then perhaps she can pull that old rolled up copy of her oath as a commisioned officer out of the closet and study it (for the first time). Dare I ask the question, where was Ms. Alphabet circa 1993- 2000 - incinerating military absentee ballots as the DoD Voting Control Officer?

[sarasmom]

LOL!
Civil Service and active duty military professionals do not "pursue" natonal security policy decisions.
They implement them.
An extremely small cadre of DOD people may provide direct input to the decision makers.Kwiatkowski is/was obviously not one of them.
Had she held such a position, she would be relaxing in a cell in Leavenworth right about now.

[AxelPaulsenJr]

Finally, you've expressed yourself clearly!

LOL, thank you.

You are obviously better suited to communicating via pictures than you are to words.

I agree. I would say the pic does a nice job of summing up what I bet a lot of people think about you.

Stick to the "Caption this" threads and you’ll do fine.

Thank you again. For a moment there I was afraid that you weren't concerned for my welfare.

As I said earlier I was going to apologize for misreading your headline. But your holier than thou attitude stopped that apology.

If putting someone down makes you feel superior, so mote it be.

[TADSLOS]

Civil Service and active duty military professionals do not "pursue" natonal security policy decisions. They implement them

Bingo.

[dead]

You should have stuck with the pictures.

[AxelPaulsenJr]

No what I should have done is not waste my time with a boorish ignorant snob like yourself. Lesson duly noted.

[dead]

Oooh, so angry. And over nothing.

I told you stick to pictures. I think this one would have adequately conveyed your bug-eyed insane yet strangely humorous rage:

You can use that picture in lieu of words on other threads if you like.

[AxelPaulsenJr]

Angry?, Not at all. But thanks for the pic, I think however, that I would rather study this pic instead:

[dead]

Well, on that fine note, I will cease arguing.