To: Jackie-O; runningbear; Devil_Anse; Sandylapper; MaggieMay; Velveeta; RGSpincich; All
"Nancy siad that the Laci hair was WOUND in the pliers on Snott's boat!!! Was he twisting chicken wire when that hair was wound onthe pliers????"
That is not true, period. One piece was found and now there are three The longest I think is 2".
Mitocondral was admitted but not as forensic evidence said this judge today.
The other judge was Beauchesne, RG
372 posted on
10/29/2003 8:38:21 PM PST by
STOCKHRSE
( The preceding is this Freeper's opinion and is submitted rhetorically. .........)
To: STOCKHRSE
Wasn't the First mention of hair as being approximately 6" long? Then it was stated that it broke into two pieces. Mitochondrial DNA is NOT evidence?? Or do you just mean that it was "entered" today and given an exhibit number?
379 posted on
10/29/2003 8:51:04 PM PST by
Canadian Outrage
(All us Western Canuks belong South)
To: STOCKHRSE; All
That is not true, period. One piece was found and now there are three The longest I think is 2".THREE pieces of hair? My gawd, Ray, I thought the hair "broke" into 2 pieces. Frankly, I thought NG was doing a little bit of embellishing tonight. ;^)
To: STOCKHRSE
WHAT is not true, period? That he was twisting chicken wire? How do we know whether that's true or not?
I heard there were TWO pieces of hair in the bag. Where are you hearing that there are three?
Are you saying that THIS judge, Girolami, said on Oct. 29, 2003, that "mitochondrial was admitted, but not as forensic evidence"?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson