To: runningbear
Groan* I know that Geragos has likely settled on his defense strategy of attacking EVERYTHING that Law Enforcement did. However, THIS IS NOT THE OJ case and Judge Girolami, Thank God, is NO Lance ITO!! One thing that always gets under my skin in regard to DNA evidence testimoney, is that Defense Lawyers attack not only it's authenticity, but they ALWAYS challenge and accuse the police of having mis-handled and contaminated the sample. What the HELL do they think that a little contamination if any, ( and I believe there was NONE),would do to the results? Make it someone ELSE's DNA? It's so blinking dumb.
350 posted on
10/29/2003 8:05:40 PM PST by
Canadian Outrage
(All us Western Canuks belong South)
To: Canadian Outrage
Groan* I know that Geragos has likely settled on his defense strategy of attacking EVERYTHING that Law Enforcement did. However,
This little tactic did not work in the Michael Peterson case either.it just took a common sense jury
390 posted on
10/29/2003 9:31:47 PM PST by
fiesti
To: Canadian Outrage
yep, but they are going to try and hope they doop some potential jurors of it....
419 posted on
10/30/2003 5:40:20 AM PST by
runningbear
(Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson