Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: editer; Devil_Anse; Sandylapper; runningbear; MaggieMay; RGSpincich; CheneyChick; Spunky; All
I'm wondering if the prosecution has opted NOT to use the wiretaps and the GPS evidence in the pre-lim as a preemptive strike. You know that this WILL be highly inflamitory, some of the conversations will infuriiate a potential jury pool. And we know MG is going to use any excuse for a change of venue.
They just simply need to have Amber testify to her relationship with Snotty, lay the groundwork to introduce the tapes at trial...in Modesto, where thousands reside, many of whom searched high and low, prayed and grieved.
199 posted on 10/29/2003 1:47:27 PM PST by Jackie-O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies ]


To: Jackie-O
That's an excellent point. I think the Prosecution is NOT going to do anything inflammatory so that the Defense can come back later with an excuse for appeal. Besides, if they don't need it yet, all the better. The Jury needs to hear Peterson's OWN voice.!! I'm convinced in my mind that the Prosecution has more than enough to cross the probable cause threshold.
323 posted on 10/29/2003 7:19:39 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson