Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jackie-O
Commentators can't get the wiretap thing straight. Some talking heads say that Amber's tapes are part of the wiretap evidence, the former prosecutor on MSNBC says that her tapes with SP are not "wiretap" evidence. MSNBC guy thinks the Amber tapes will come in, others say the prosecution has elected to forego them in the prelim.
198 posted on 10/29/2003 1:45:46 PM PST by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies ]


To: RGSpincich
I saw Lester Holt mistakenly say that the wiretaps and GPS had been excluded and "isn't that a victory for the Defense?" The reporter corrected him and said that the State simply chose not to use it at the pre-lim.
201 posted on 10/29/2003 1:51:05 PM PST by Jackie-O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies ]

To: RGSpincich
I think they're trying to avoid that Franks issue--regarding accusations that police lied in their affidavits--until after the prelim. In order for them to introduce any wiretaps now, the Franks issue would have to be resolved.

But the conversations btw Scott and Amber which are also wiretapped conversations are sort of a special case. I don't see why Amber couldn't relate some of those conversations based simply on her having participated and heard it all herself--w/o reference to any wiretaps.
212 posted on 10/29/2003 2:14:25 PM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson