Skip to comments.
Apple update has 'em standing in line for good reason
Chicago Sun Times ^
| 10/28/2003
| ANDY IHNATKO Advertisement
Posted on 10/28/2003 6:03:26 PM PST by Vermonter
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
The next big rev of Windows is still a long ways off. Yet I have no earthly idea if in 2005 they'll be able to produce an OS to match the one that Apple had in 2003
1
posted on
10/28/2003 6:03:27 PM PST
by
Vermonter
To: *Macuser_list
ping
2
posted on
10/28/2003 6:04:06 PM PST
by
Vermonter
(Do not remove this tag under penalty of law!)
To: Vermonter
No posting from The Onion. Didn't you get the word?
To: Vermonter
when the gamers start using Apple computers, then I will consider buying one.
As long as the gamers use PCs, that is THE indication that PCs are still at the top of the heap.
4
posted on
10/28/2003 6:09:00 PM PST
by
fqued
(The mainstream media wouldn't over-rate anyone, would they?)
To: Leroy S. Mort
Didn't you get the word? Nah, I'm part of that 10 percent that NEVER gets the word.
5
posted on
10/28/2003 6:09:05 PM PST
by
Vermonter
(Do not remove this tag under penalty of law!)
To: Vermonter
Your in double digits now? Gee I didnt get that word.
To: Vermonter
Still the computer for the rich of us. I won't comment on the quality. It appears to be there. But Mac continues to plummit in market share.
Meanwhile AMD has 64 bit chips and MS has a 64 bit server OS.
7
posted on
10/28/2003 6:12:32 PM PST
by
js1138
To: js1138
Still the computer for the rich of us.$799---including monitor, modem, Ethernet, DVD-ROM/CD-RW drive---is too expensive? That amount of money would buy a pretty weak PC, too.
8
posted on
10/28/2003 6:22:00 PM PST
by
mcg1969
To: mcg1969
I don't know what 800 will get you in a Mac. It could get you a pretty nice PC.
9
posted on
10/28/2003 6:30:14 PM PST
by
js1138
To: Vermonter
However, I've heard that Longhorn (the code name for the replacement to Windows XP) will sport a lot of highly original features. I highly doubt that Microsoft will try to steal the look and feel of MacOS X 10.x versions given the nasty Apple v. Microsoft trial of the late 1980's over look and feel.
To: RayChuang88
Umm, yes, Longhorn will be nice when it's released---in 2005.
11
posted on
10/28/2003 6:41:36 PM PST
by
mcg1969
To: mcg1969
You do have to remember the Longhorn is at the same stage that Chicago (the code name for Windows 95) was back at the end of 1993, just over 1.5 years from Windows 95's release. I expect many changes before we see a feature freeze that will define how Longhorn works--and probably will see Longhorn be released on August 24, 2005 as Windows 2005 in both Home and Professional editions.
To: js1138
You get what you pay for - Apples are engineered, high quality products, not the slapped together crap you get from HP, etc. Apple is poised to take over in the next five years IMHO because Microsoft has p*ssed off so many previously loyal customers with their obsession for building software that surrepticiously snoops around for what you're doing on your PC. Who needs that sh*t?
13
posted on
10/28/2003 6:51:59 PM PST
by
afz400
To: js1138
14
posted on
10/28/2003 6:57:51 PM PST
by
Sabertooth
(No Drivers' Licences for Illegal Aliens. Petition SB60. http://www.saveourlicense.com/n_home.htm)
To: Vermonter
I have a iMac, but it is about 3 years old. Since I am not computer savvy, is there anyway I can buy an OS for mine? I am asking I suppose, if it will run in an older mac?
15
posted on
10/28/2003 7:01:12 PM PST
by
ladyinred
(Talk about a revolution, look at California!!! We dumped Davis!!!)
To: Sabertooth
With a dvd burner and 80 gig drive it's $1100. 80 gig hard drives are running about $60 and dvd burners can be had for $150. Retail.
I have no problem with Apple's quality, but I can't afford them.
16
posted on
10/28/2003 7:03:32 PM PST
by
js1138
To: afz400
HP throws together "crap"? Interesting..Didn't know Apple had any servers to go head to head with HP.
Oh, you meant desktop....Well, Apple might want to consider porting to x86 or IA 64. I can't think of too many Fortune 500's that would ditch 100K+ in Intel based desktop's for PowerPC's. Nice chip (I love RISC), no where near able to compete (dollar for dollar) against the cheaper Intel's and AMD's.
To: js1138
80gig for 60 bucks? What kind of drive (brand) and do you have a site?
(I assume it's IDE, but what rpm?)
To: js1138
For $1600, you can get the G5, which is 64 bit, and 10.3, which has 64 bit pieces. That's not too shabby. It's not PC cheap, but it's price/performance ain't bad.
Scientists are just jumping on the Mac bandwagon. A workstation that does native Microsoft Word, computations and data reduction as a Unix, and you can integrate it in a Windows environment, as well as in a Unix environment. And for the most part, it does it out of the box. That's some powerful mojo. That's why I'm using a mac right now, anyway.
19
posted on
10/28/2003 7:13:07 PM PST
by
ThinkPlease
(Fortune Favors the Bold!)
To: All
20
posted on
10/28/2003 7:13:25 PM PST
by
Bob J
(www.freerepublic.net www.radiofreerepublic.com...check them out!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson