To: SJackson
I do not disagree. As I wrote, my definition of weapons is that a weapon is more than the physical thing. It is more than a bullet or a bomb. It is strategy, willpower, tactics, political commitment used to sucess to defeat an enemy by the application of power. We have the power and now we must use it.
I'll digress and consider a problem we have with respect to a sucessful srategy. The elite media and bleeding heart types will forever equate the sucessful strategy of President Truman and that of unsuccessful Hitler with that of opression, barbarism, Hitler-like, etc., that is, if war is not pretty, surgical, sterile, fast, cheap, not bloody and immediately victorious then it must be wrong, criminal, Hitler-like, you name it, it will be in the op-ed page. War is dirty and the first consideration in war is to win. Pick up the pieces later.
BTW, a former communicant in this thread was posed these precise questions which were not answered. I commend you for considering them. Consider them, point by point, question for question, then offer a final understanding. It would please me and I suspect it would offer insight into the Socratic method, the basis for civilized thinking and understanding.
To: Final Authority
I suspect it would offer insight into the Socratic method, the basis for civilized thinking and understanding. I've seen little evidence of that so far in your posts.
58 posted on
10/30/2003 4:39:32 AM PST by
Coop
(God bless our troops!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson