Replies

In which post did you answer that?

We need to stop and think about this here. You obviously have me confused with someone else. I am good for the next 500 replies or so. I have never (knowingly) backed down from my end of an argument. When did you say what you would do with the villagers you had run out of their home?

Again, don't take this as obfuscation on my part. If my point is stupid, I will point this out better than you in the end. I just don't see where you answered my question.

Read reply 39. If you need remedial reading I could help you find a source.

The problem with considering answers to questions is it requires cogent thought, something that you have not offered in the thread yet, at least, as directed to me. Answers also identify the ability to think based on thoughfulness and comprehension. Also, answers tend to un-cloak the politics of an individual. But answers are the only way to continue a dialog. Since you cannot or will not consider my questions I will forever consider you outside of the discussion for any topic. You are not good for 500 replies unless you consider them gratuitous.

The problem with the questions I posed is that if you follow the logic and come to a conclusion, you and I could not differ by doctrine, only by means. That must be troubling.