ON FIRE! With Tom Adkins!
If you’ve never listened to Tom, tune in and find out why he’s called a cross between Rush Limbaugh and Michael Savage!
7pm Pacific/10pm Eastern!
Posted on 10/28/2003 12:44:54 AM PST by witnesstothefall
DEFIANCE, Iowa -- Townspeople knew about Scott Shanahan's temper, that he was often moody and was anti-social. Some people said they saw the bruises that his wife, Dixie, tried to hide.
But authorities say Dixie Shanahan, 36, kept her biggest secret for the 14 months that followed her husband's August 2002 disappearance. This past week, Scott Shanahan's skeletal remains were found in a spare bedroom in their house. An autopsy showed he had been shot in the head.
Dixie Shanahan has since been ordered held on a charge of first-degree murder, and her children - ages 7, 5 and 8 months - have been placed in state custody.
Her lawyer, public defender Greg Steensland, did not return a message left Saturday seeking comment on the case.
In July, nearly a year after Dixie Shanahan had reported her husband missing, she told sheriff's Deputy John Kelly that he had left her and moved to the nearby town of Atlantic.
Neighbors had already noticed a change in her.
"She was free - like a weight had been lifted off her shoulders," said Mary Schmitz.
Schmitz and her son, Doug, said that they never saw Dixie Shanahan with bruises but that there were rumors that abuse was common in the household.
"I can see what she went through, and he got what he deserved if what they say is true," Mary Schmitz said.
Court records show that on several occasions Scott Shanahan beat his wife, leaving her bloody and bruised.
In October 2000, a friend of Dixie Shanahan's told deputies that he had dragged her to the basement, tied her hands with a coat hanger and told her he could leave her there for weeks and "no one would know the difference," court records show. She went to a women's shelter in Texas, near relatives, but soon returned.
Resident Mickey Kloewer said people knew of the abuse. "But you didn't want to intrude in their business," Kloewer said.
Dixie Shanahan had moved in with Scott Shanahan and his mother, Bev, in this western Iowa town of 350 people when she was a foster child about 14 years old. They married about eight or nine years ago and stayed in the same house, which his mother had left to him when she died.
Doug Schmitz and other neighbors described Scott Shanahan as moody and anti-social.
No one thought much about his disappearance until several months had passed and they noticed he had left his pickup truck and dog behind, Doug Schmitz said.
"People joked about it, that he was buried in the back yard, or buried in concrete in the basement," Doug Schmitz said.
Karen Kloewer said the case has shaken the town.
"It's heartbreaking to think she didn't think she could turn anywhere for help," she said. "I think the whole town stands behind her and is feeling for her and her children. I just wish she would have turned to the community for help."
"She was free - like a weight had been lifted off her shoulders," said Mary Schmitz.
..And come up with THIS headline:
Town saw wife change when husband vanished
Any man who strikes a woman is not a man. Period.
So then don't complain when the thread takes a turn down that road.
Our grandfathers would not have a problem with that statement, and that's clearly the spirit in which I meant it.
Many moralisms are stated in absolute terms, for the very good reason that it sends the message that the moral crime should never happen among moral people.
Morality lessons aren't very instructional if not expressed in absolute terms, are they?
But I understand your point. You were just making an argument, not imparting an idea.
Misogyny and misandry were invented sometime shortly after Adam and Eve bit the big one, probably as a direct result of their culinary errors. Currently, misandry is quite popular amongst the distaff "knuckle draggers". Check out the offerings in a greeting-card store. Or the Lifetime Movie Network. It ain't purty, and it's getting worse. But it will also pass; societal stupidity is always changing.
I consider physical violence and verbal cruelty unacceptable methods of settling interpersonal disputes for either sex. I don't think that's a particularly "modern" idea.
Absolutism is the refuge of small minds. For example, the Ten Commandments say "Thou shall not kill" - but there are many situations where killing is justified and even moral. So one needs to engage the ol' brain to sort out individual situations. Otherwise, you're no better than those "zero-tolerance" nitwits who suspend a kid for bringing nail clippers to school.
Boo hoo. Sniff. ROFL.
man-on-woman violence is slightly more contemptible than its inverse
I used to think that, too. I've seen really vile misandric behaviour from women who are constantly ranting about "violence against women". The hypocricy seems to elude them. They want equality? Fine. I'll hold them in equal contempt as abusive men...
May I ask how old you are? Very curious.
She got the the first and last "S-word" correct. But the middle one is not Spare bedroom.
7pm Pacific/10pm Eastern!
So, then, do you believe that it is always wrong to kill?
I'm on the same side as you about "zero tolerance" in the schools.
But the Sixth Commandment is more accurately translated "Thou shalt not murder."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.