What you wrote is a lie.
The NRA does not stand for registration. They don't support registration. They have fought and will fight registration.
Shooter 2.5 says:
"The NRA does not stand for registration. They don't support registration."
Mr. Halbrook's own words, uttered of his own free will, in court, just a couple of weeks ago:
THE COURT: THE GOVERNMENT CAN PUT RESTRICTIONS ON THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS.MR. HALBROOK: YOUR HONOR, WE ARE HERE WANTING TO REGISTER HANDGUNS. WE ARE NOT HERE WANTING UNRESTRICTED ACCESS. WE'RE NOT HERE ASKING TO CARRY THEM, OTHER THAN IN THE HOME.
THE COURT: YOU'RE SAYING THAT THE GOVERNMENT CAN IMPOSE REASONABLE RESTRICTIONS?
MR. HALBROOK: YES, YOUR HONOR. YES, YOUR HONOR.
[See: http://KeepAndBearArms.com/Silveira/Halbrook.asp for the full transcript, with annotations.]
Read the full transcript and decide for yourself.
Using 2A to register handguns is not wise.
Angel Shamaya
KeepAndBearArms.com
To Shooter 2.5
I for the sake of the fight to keep and bear arms was never said in a court of law.
I too son of the American Revolution can have my guns when they are empty.
Chicagofarmer
Below actual court testimony in DC court.
THE COURT: THE GOVERNMENT CAN PUT RESTRICTIONS ON THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS.
MR. HALBROOK: YOUR HONOR, WE ARE HERE WANTING TO REGISTER HANDGUNS. WE ARE NOT HERE WANTING UNRESTRICTED ACCESS. WE'RE NOT HERE ASKING TO CARRY THEM, OTHER THAN IN THE HOME.
THE COURT: YOU'RE SAYING THAT THE GOVERNMENT CAN IMPOSE REASONABLE RESTRICTIONS?
MR. HALBROOK: YES, YOUR HONOR. YES, YOUR HONOR.
http://KeepAndBearArms.com/Silveira/Halbrook.asp for the full transcript, with annotations
Here is the transcript the NRA attorney telling the Judge that registration is OK.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1002273/posts Here more stuff.
http://www.keepandbeararms.com/information/XcIBViewItem.asp?ID=3618