[Sandylapper]

Would the paint on the boat be better evidence than a tie-in to the garments she was apparently wearing? Guess that would also be "chemical" and "circumstantial" evidence Cindy was talking about, wouldn't it?

[Jackie-O]

Maybe not better, but a nice addition, don't you think? If he lied about what she was wearing, and if he gave a blow by blow discription of his "fishing trip" and did not mention tieing off, and he may not have, for fear that someone may have spotted him.Maybe he did not have an answer ready for that instance. In the beginning he seemed to be making it up as he went along. He did his homework on some things, but others he was just plain dumb. Like telling the Detective that the power was out at his storage facility...did'nt it now dawn on him that they could verify that claim??
I'm still wondering about Cindy's riddle. I think when it comes up in the pre-lim, we will all go (at the same time), THAT'S WHAT SHE WAS TALKING ABOUT!!!!

[Velveeta]

LOL, that Cindy Adams teaser still has me wondering and guessing too.

[Canadian Outrage]

Sandy I think both of those pieces of evidence are VERY POWERFUL. The Prosecution has MORE THAN ENOUGH to have this thing bound over. I was watching a bit of Abrams before I came to the computer. He had a retired, seasoned Prosecutor there as well as Gloria Allred and two dimtit Defense Attorneys. Defense attorney's always spew nonsense suggesting that Amber likely only has salacious evidence to give. I noticed Allred smile and then the Prosecutor said, NO Experienced Prosecutors, such as the two on this case, would ever charge a death penalty case without powerful evidence. As to the threashold to getting it bound over for trial - COUNT IT DONE!!