Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: First_Salute
Firefighters were spread thinly around threatened communities, focusing on saving what homes they could.

More evidence of the helplessness of the American public in the face of any kind of disaster. The first thing they do is run away from their homes and demand that the government "do something".

Wouldn't you think that local communities would put together a little firefighting training as part of their homeland security responsibilities? First aid? Basic survival? Communication without cell phones?

No, it's much easier to squat in a high-school gymnasium somewhere and sit out the disaster. Let big brother take care of you. He knows what's best.

15 posted on 10/27/2003 3:55:39 AM PST by snopercod (I am waiting for the rebirth of wonder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: snopercod
Wouldn't you think that local communities would put together a little firefighting training as part of their homeland security responsibilities? First aid? Basic survival? Communication without cell phones?

If many are not smart enough or willing to build and landscape their homes in ways that minimize their risk from wildfires, I'd say the answer to your question is No.

16 posted on 10/27/2003 3:59:39 AM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: snopercod
Actually, the way it works now is that the the Forest Service will fine you a fortune for clearing around your house for having disturbed the lesser whatsit, the fire starts, the Forest Service shows up and orders you off your property, then you huddle in the gymnasium while the Forest Service has a meeting, the union rep decides the fire is too big, and so they run for their lives telling themselves it's natural and the people shouldn't have been there.

Condsider the Winter Fire

17 posted on 10/27/2003 4:09:04 AM PST by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: snopercod
I worry about what could happen right downtown in the center of the city.

The property owner(s), the insurance companies, and the fire department have convinced themselves that "people will only hurt themselves or each other if they use the fire hoses."

I do not know how widespread through the downtown area, this is in effect, but the net of it is that:

There are no firehoses in the building --- the hoses have been removed!

Our building is just opposite the state capitol.

A friend who worked at a local hospital, made a tour through it to double-check and found that:

There are no firehoses in the hospital!

This means, that if the Islamic terrorists hit the downtown with fire, The New York Times will get to write up the story of the pool of metal that remains of the "brave first responders' fire truck." And you all can wonder what really happened.

I'm here to tell you all beforehand, that I am the first responsder --- you heard the story here, first.

About the amateur who tried, not to get water, but firehoses with which to deliver the water --- the firehoses that previously were in the buildings, but had been removed upon the decisions of "experts" according to our government now under the control of the judiciary.

The statutes require the hoses.

The judges do not.

22 posted on 10/27/2003 5:31:10 AM PST by First_Salute (God save our democratic-republican government, from a government by judiciary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson