To: SarahW
I am not dictating her dress. But I have EVERY RIGHT to express my opinion. I also have my right to my beliefs. I have a right to be sanctimonious if I wish. I know that you modern promiscuous sex-promoting anti-religious bigots feel that you can spew hatred of traditional religious believers with impunity, but then cry for censorship if any traditional religious believer so much as expresses his or her opinion. Frankly, dressing like Madonna or Britney Spears is a step backward for women. The sexual revolution had a victim, and it is women, since it freed men from any obligations to commitment. That's what I believe and what I will continue to believe. I am simply saying that this is not progress for women or for Afghanistan, plus it is unwise to provide propaganda for the Taliban, particularly since the new regime is not yet secure. But apparently the model dwells in the US and did it of her own accord, so there is nothing one can do about it. However, I still believe it unwise, and if she falsely acted as if she was officially representing her government, then that is dishonest.
To: Unam Sanctam
Bikinis did not free men from having to "commit".
You have a right to be called sanctimonious, and wrong. By me.
Who is censoring you, anyway? Just mind your own dress, if you feel it protects you from your sin nature. (It doesn't.)
74 posted on
10/27/2003 10:28:19 AM PST by
SarahW
To: Unam Sanctam
I wonder why you object to a woman revealing her physical body, that God
did create. It is written that Adam and Eve were naked in Eden, only to find shame in their bodies after defying God, obeying Satan and eating of the "tree of knowledge". It is not God who finds shame in nudity; it is the influence of Satan and the initial defiance of God's commands that has brought about "prudishness".
BTW, rethink your statement that posters here are "modern promiscuous sex-promoting anti-religious bigots"
Your "shame" is your problem. Deal with it.
To: Unam Sanctam
"The sexual revolution had a victim, and it is women, since it freed men from any obligations to commitment."
Careful what you wish for, you just may get it!
149 posted on
10/28/2003 11:30:45 AM PST by
bk1000
(one of these days I simply MUST come up with a decent tag line.)
To: Unam Sanctam
Frankly, dressing like Madonna or Britney Spears is a step backward for women. The sexual revolution had a victim, and it is womenI'll ask you the question others in the "we're headed downhill" crowd always decline to answer. What year was the highpoint for women? In other words, we were going in the right direction until when? When did the downhill trend begin?
To: Unam Sanctam
it is unwise to provide propaganda for the Taliban That is precisely why we should avoid even the appearance of kow-towing to their medievalism. Bring on the bikinis!
169 posted on
10/29/2003 8:05:56 AM PST by
steve-b
To: Unam Sanctam
you modern promiscuous sex-promoting anti-religious bigots If this is how you characterize those who disagree with you, don't be surprised that you don't have many allies.
178 posted on
10/29/2003 11:32:08 AM PST by
malakhi
(Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path.)
To: Unam Sanctam
How's the diet going?
205 posted on
10/30/2003 3:44:19 PM PST by
MonroeDNA
(Please become a monthly donor!!! Just $3 a month--you won't miss it, and will feel proud!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson