Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Smokin' Joe
And, of course, you mean that the kid, if he'd had his own firearm, would probably be alive today.
508 posted on 11/02/2003 3:34:47 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 507 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah
Please show me how you came up with that inference.

Review my posts. You will find that I have repeatedly stated that the person who did the shooting may well have been in the wrong, but that we do not have the full picture.

Apparently, the local Law Enforcement folks did not see the need to arrest the shooter or file charges at the time, which says there was at least some significant question in their minds about whether the shooting was unjustified.

It seems you would hold all firearms owners responsible for this event.

If a drunk runs over someone's 5 year-old at three AM, would you blame all drinkers? all drivers? or would you wonder what the 5-year-old was doing in the street at 3 AM?

Whatever extenuating circumstances are involved, the simple fact remains, the kid would be alive today if the kid hadn't been screwing around the guy's house at all.

509 posted on 11/02/2003 4:14:10 PM PST by Smokin' Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 508 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson