Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Shooter 2.5
What do they claim is the constitutional problem?
11 posted on 10/25/2003 2:54:48 PM PDT by Sloth ("I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!" -- Jacobim Mugatu, 'Zoolander')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sloth
Missouri: That the right of every citizen to keep and bear arms in defense of his home, person and property, or when lawfully summoned in aid of the civil power, shall not be questioned; but this shall not justify the wearing of concealed weapons. Art. I, § 23 (enacted 1945).

I think they're claiming since it's not spelled out in the Constitution, the legislation couldn't be enacted.

Or some BS like that.
14 posted on 10/25/2003 3:25:10 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson