[TaxRelief]

The problem with your argument, that we should see what happens if the tubes are removed, ignores three basic facts: 1. She is being held prisoner in her room in the hospice.
2. She has had no chance to relearn to eat.
3. No one is allowed to provide her with regular food or drink, either.

[Legerdemain]

The problem with your argument, that we should see what happens if the tubes are removed, ignores three basic facts: 1. She is being held prisoner in her room in the hospice. 2. She has had no chance to relearn to eat. 3. No one is allowed to provide her with regular food or drink, either.

doubtful, we do not have the full 13 year medical record, but I imagine that at one time, or several times, the facility has tried to see if she would eat on her own....just my guess, but again, betcha I am right

[Gringo1]

"She is being held prisoner in her room in the hospice."

No she isn't. As her legal guardian, her husband can control who can see her and who doesn't, and he understandably doesn't want every yahoo with a "miracle cure" in her room or the god squad U.N. "monitors" tromping around either.It is his decision, not yours.

You guys would have her put on public display?