[Xenalyte]

Once again your lack of comprehension does not disappoint.

My position contradicts nothing but yours. Kindly tell me how it's self-contradictory, which is what I guess you meant when you wrote, "Your own contradiction is glaring to say the least."

I believe that God is in charge. I further believe that even if He isn't, Terri left nothing in writing - all we have is the highly suspect word of her husband that her wish is to die.

So tell us how she can be suffering now, while being nourished, but how she won't suffer once she starts starving.

I shall await your reply anxiously.

[Gringo1]

"Once again your lack of comprehension does not disappoint."

Say something that makes a lick of sense given the legal argument here and maybe you will get an answer.




"I believe that God is in charge. I further believe that even if He isn't, Terri left nothing in writing - all we have is the highly suspect word of her husband that her wish is to die."


Here is where your bias comes in.

So your argumentis that the world should do what the god squad says because she didn't write anything down, you do not like her husband, and god is in charge.

And once again:
"So tell us how she can be suffering now, while being nourished, but how she won't suffer once she starts starving"

Tell me how she isn't suffering. How do you know?
This shell game can go on forever, and the word game cuts both ways.You want me to offer proof, I want you to offer proof....woohoo! we are really getting somewhere now.

Face it, the god squad lost in court when it tried to strip her legal guardian of his rights, and will again when the Florida legislatures Save Terri Law gets a hearing before people who are not blinded by religious zealotry and a hatred of Terri Schiavos husband.